A Battle or a Campaign? Historical Facts about the Battle of Al-Qādisiyya (636/637?) and the Role of Story-tellers in the Origin of its Narratives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19350061 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Krzysztof Kościelniak (0000-0002-3915-335X, Jagiellonian University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Pages | 24-40 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0080-3545 |
| Publisher | Polish Academy of Sciences Chancellery (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.24425/ro.2020.134043 |
| OpenAlex | W3164985082 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 13 |
The paper presents how the pluralism of relations in the early Muslim sources concerning the memory the Qādisiyya narrative is problematic for reconstructing the event of the battle by modern scholars. Specific studies of the early Islamic sources concerning the Battle of Al-Qādisiyya lead to the conclusion that it is certainly easier to interpret the functions of particular topoi than to determinate the facts about the Maʿrakat al-Qādisiyya. The main, unsolved questions related to the Qādisiyyah narrative are the uncertainty of the date of the battle, the size of the Muslim and Persian forces that fought in the Maʿrakat al-Qādisiyya as well as some contradictions and different presentations of the battle. Scholars have undertaken many attempts to make the conflicting accounts more coherent but in fact, they only made some speculations or, at the best, case scenario – explanations made on the basis of limited and uncertain evidence. For these reasons, the paper contains the suggestion to avoid an undue emphasis on the importance of the Maʿrakat al-Qādisiyya and to replace this term by the more general expression “the Mesopotamian campaign 634–637.” The critical evaluation of the Muslim sources leads to a more general description of the Battle of Al-Qādisiyya as an element of the campaign (stage 634–637) whose unambiguous evaluation is impossible
Ancient history · Art · Battle · Genealogy · Literature · Narrative · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Islamic Studies and History
Hagarism
The Political History of Iran Under the Sasanians
Decline and Fall of the Sasanian Empire
Iraq After The Muslim Conquest
Two Pre-Modern Muslim Historians
Arabs and Iranians in the Islamic Conquest Narrative
A History of Muslim Historiography
The Arab Conquest of Iran and Its Aftermath
The Effects of the Muslim Conquest on the Persian Population of Iraq
The Armenian History attributed to Sebeos
Ṭabarī on the Companions of the Prophet
The Early Arabic Historical Tradition
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |