Individual privacy rights with respect to services such as Google Street View
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19354069 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Thornton (0000-0001-7847-5696, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 70-76 |
| Publication date | 2010-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0095-2737 • E-ISSN: 2167-3055 |
| Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1145/1929609.1929618 |
| OpenAlex | W2051304151 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
For a person to squeeze his fingers is legal. For a person to face towards another person is legal. For a person to sight down the barrel of a gun is legal. Yet, for that same person to do all three of these things at once is very illegal. Although Google Street View, or GSV for short, and similar services may be comprised of previously accepted functions---operation of an automobile, photography, internet publishing, mapmaking, advertising, etc.---the whole of a thing is far different from the constituent pieces with which it is comprised. The context, accessibility, and ease of manipulation pertaining to the data presented by Google are radically altered by the organization that is fundamental to the product. Google Street View must be evaluated as an experimental and almost completely unprecedented foray into a still developing area of technology
Advertising · Business · Computer security · Context (archaeology) · Face (sociological concept) · Geography · Internet privacy · Political science · Product (mathematics) · Publishing · Sight · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digitalization, Law, and Regulation · Law · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
| Highly cited | No |
|---|