Guidelines for conducting and publishing systematic reviews in Psychology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19355383 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lucas De Francisco Carvalho (0000-0002-3274-9724, Universidade São Francisco), Giselle Pianowski (0000-0003-4400-7151, Universidade São Francisco), Manoel Antônio Dos Santos (0000-0001-8214-7767, Universidade de São Paulo) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0103-166X • E-ISSN: 1982-0275 |
| Publisher | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/1982-0275201936e180144 |
| OpenAlex | W2991675059 |
| SciELO | S0103-166X2019000101101 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 20 |
The systematic review refers to the literature review guided by scientific methods explicitly intended to reduce bias, resulting in a synthesis of all relevant evidence for a given issue. In Brazil, specifically in Psychology, systematic review is found in the literature; however, the available studies do not always reflect the gold standard or what is expected in terms of typical systematic review procedures. The present study is structured in the form of a didactic guide, organized in topics, which should be typically contemplated in an systematic review in Psychology. The information that must be contained in each of these topics is indicated, including which procedures should be performed in the typical steps of the development of an systematic review. The present publication intends to increase the interest and investment of researchers in systematic review, providing them with information to improve the quality of systematic review in the area of Psychology in Brazil
Engineering ethics · Management science · MEDLINE · Political science · Publishing · Scientific literature · Systematic review · Applied Psychology · Engineering · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychological Testing and Assessment · Psychology
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching
Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |