Problems and Prospects for the Formation of a General Methodology of Knowledge. Philosophical Reflections

Bibliographic Data

ID19370420
AuthorsZOYA STEZHKO (Central Ukrainian National Technical University), NATALIIA SHALIMOVA (0000-0001-7564-4343)
Year2022
Volume33
Issue3
Publication date2022-09-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFilosofija. Sociologija (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0235-7186 • E-ISSN: 2424-4546
PublisherLithuanian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER • LT)
DOI10.6001/fil-soc.v33i3.4765
OpenAlexW4296592617
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

The article analyses the problems and possibilities of forming a general methodological paradigm for the study, explanation and forecasting of social processes – in the context of the philosophical concepts of G. Hegel and F. Nietzsche. In particular, a fundamental possibility for forming a general methodological paradigm based on a dynamic balance of not optimal, but possible is analysed. The paper outlines the positive and negative aspects of the methodological paradigms of rationalism and irrationalism (postmodernism); points out the possibility of terminological discourse in determining the content of concepts and categories; emphasises the efficiency of the methodological paradigm of rationalism on the example of the analysis and implementation of the philosophical category ‘measure’; substantiates the need for improvement of the spiritual priorities of various groups of the population – with a special emphasis on the layer of politicians

Epistemology · Hegelianism · Postmodernism · Rationalism · Social science · Sociology · Philosophy · Psychology · Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access