Grading A‐level Double Subject Mathematicians and the Implications for Selection

This study used entry data from the 1980 Summer examination of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate to assess the comparative grading of two forms of double mathematics: separate Pure and Applied papers as against Mathematics and Further Mathematics. The data confirm expectation, and existing evidence, in finding that whilst in the former system the two resulting grades are approximately equal, in the latter case large grade differences abound. These different patterns suggest that there may be some lack of comparability between the two types of award. Using grades in Physics as a monitor it is shown that if the aggregate is based upon the compensatory model then those entering the separate papers appear to achieve less well (and significantly so at certain levels). On the other hand if the conjunctive model is adopted then the two systems appear to yield very similar results. These findings, if typical of the national picture, have clear implications for those involved with the selection of post‐Alevel students, particularly for further study in mathematics and related subjects

Combinatorics · Comparability · Mathematics education · Statistics · Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · Mathematics Education and Programs · Psychology · School Choice and Performance · Artificial Intelligence