What matters for productive feedback? Disciplinary practices and their relational dynamics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19378409 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rachelle Esterhazy (0000-0003-0494-1417, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1302-1314 |
| Publication date | 2018-11-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463353 |
| OpenAlex | W2895162375 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 33 |
| References cited | 13 |
Most research on feedback has paid limited attention to the role of disciplines and their relational dynamics. This article addresses this limitation by offering a conceptualisation of feedback as a relational process that emerges through feedback encounters shaped by the educational and professional practices of the discipline. Using data from a qualitative case study of an undergraduate software engineering course unit, it explores the relational dynamics between different elements of the course and how these dynamics matter for the emergence of productive feedback encounters. The findings show that a wide range of productive feedback encounters occurred between students and both human and material sources throughout the course. Feedback encounters were productive when students had the opportunity to navigate the tools and conventions necessary to participate in the educational practices of the course and, by extension, the discipline’s professional practices. Different learning activities were characterised by distinctive relational dynamics that provided various opportunities and constraints for productive feedback encounters to emerge. The findings demonstrate the importance of accounting for disciplinary practices and their relational aspects when designing for learning activities that aim to enable students to productively seek out and engage with feedback
Discipline · Higher education · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
Contextual variables in written assessment feedback in a university-level Spanish program
Quality of Feedback in Higher Education
Disciplinary perspectives on feedback processes
Context matters! Unpacking its role in evaluative judgement through the Theory of Practice Architectures
Observational feedback literacy
Hidden impacts of precarity on teaching
Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy
Characteristics of productive feedback encounters in online learning
The pedagogical power of recognition in feedback
Towards a new paradigm
Teacher feedback literacy, feedback regimes and iterative change
Meaning making about performance
Nudging dialogic pedagogical design of peer feedback towards exploratory collaboration
Feedback seeking and student reflective feedback literacy
Discipline-specific feedback literacies
Perceived teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation and engagement in English learning
Feedback encounters
Feedback as an epistemic practice
Feedback practices in clinical placement
What feedback literate teachers do
Unravelling students’ self-feedback in peer-feedback processes
Understanding the place and value of GenAI feedback
Signature feedback practices in the creative arts
Performing teacher feedback literacy in peer mentoring meetings
Comparing Generative AI and teacher feedback
How university students work on assessment tasks with generative artificial intelligence
Authentic feedback
Feedback literacy-as-event
Empowering agency through learner-orchestrated self-generated feedback
The care-full craft of feedback in an age of generative AI
Assessment professional development courses for university teachers
Feedback encounters in doctoral supervision
Evaluating an AI speaking assessment tool
Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback
Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education
Focus on Formative Feedback
Mind as Action
Researching feedback dialogue
Rethinking models of feedback for learning
Supervision at the outline stage
Unpacking the feedback process
Recontextualisation processes as sense-making practice in student-writers' collaborative dialogue
| Unique citing works | 33 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5.5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 33 |