Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Students’ perceptions of the assessment programme’s impact on self-regulated learning

A multiple-case study

Bibliographic Data

ID19379703
AuthorsLonneke H Schellekens (0000-0002-2535-2331, Utrecht University, corresponding author), Marieke van der Schaaf (0000-0001-6555-5320, Utrecht Center for Research and Development of Health Professions Education, University Medical Centre Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands), Liesbeth Baartman (0000-0002-3369-9992, Research Group Vocational Education, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands), Cees P M Van Der Vleuten (Maastricht University), Cees Van Der Vleuten (0000-0001-6802-3119, Maastricht University), Wim D J Kremer (Utrecht University), Harold G J Bok (0000-0002-6435-0240, Utrecht University)
Year2024
Volume49
Issue8
Pages1074-1090
Publication date2024-11-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02602938.2024.2343317
OpenAlexW4396960971
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited45

It is assumed that a programmatic approach to assessment supports students’ self-regulated learning (SRL). This study investigated students’ perceptions of this assumed support. Using a multiple-case study design, this study examined students’ perceptions in two distinct study programmes. In each case, first-year students were enrolled in an assessment programme that was designed in accordance with the principles of programmatic assessment, which integrate both assessment purposes of assessment for learning (AfL) and assessment of learning (AoL). The second-year students in each case were enrolled in an assessment programme with a traditional AoL assessment approach. The findings suggest that in both cases first-year students perceived their assessment programme as more positive for their learning than second-year students. Through a cross-case analysis of students’ perceptions of the two assessment programmes, three themes were identified that are essential to support students’ SRL: 1) assessment design; 2) assessment as a dialogue; and 3) assessment as an information source. Key aspects of the themes that support or hinder SRL are discussed. The findings of this study highlight the importance of programme-level assessment design to support students in their SRL

Assessment for learning · Formative assessment · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Perception · Self-assessment · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Medicine · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education · Student Assessment and Feedback

  • Programmatic assessment for learning

    Dario Torre, Lambert Schuwirth•Medical Teacher•2025

  • Twelve tips to afford students agency in programmatic assessment

    Open Access•Janica Jamieson, Dario Torre•Medical Teacher•2025

  • How to close the learning circle? Students’ perspectives on how programmatic assessment influences self-regulated learning in a global online programme

    Open Access•Xian Liu, Diana Dolmans et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2025

  • Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback

    Open Access•Naomi E Winstone, Robert A Nash et al.•Educational Psychologist•2017

  • The Impact of Assessment on Student Learning

    Open Access•Chris Rust•Active Learning in Higher Education•2002

  • A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose

    Cees Van Der Vleuten, C P M van der Vleuten et al.•Medical Teacher•2012

  • Models of Self-regulated Learning

    Minna Puustinen, Lea Pulkkinen•Scandinavian Journal of…•2001

  • Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment

    Open Access•Ernesto Panadero, Heidi Andrade et al.•The Australian Educational…•2018

  • Stakes in the eye of the beholder

    Open Access•Suzanne Schut, Erik W Driessen et al.•Medical Education•2018

  • Formative Assessment

    Open Access•Ian Clark•Educational Psychology Review•2012

  • A Review of Self-regulated Learning

    Open Access•Ernesto Panadero•Frontiers in Psychology•2017

  • Student perspectives on programmatic assessment in a large medical programme

    Open Access•Chris Roberts, Priya Khanna et al.•Medical Education•2022

  • Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment – 2. Implementation and practice

    Dario Torre, Neil E Rice et al.•Medical Teacher•2021

  • Students’ perceptions of assessment quality related to their learning approaches and learning outcomes

    Open Access•Karin J Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, Desirée Joosten-ten Brinke et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2019

  • The implications of programme assessment patterns for student learning

    Tansy Jessop, Carmen Tomàs•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2017

  • How does assessment drive learning? A focus on students’ development of evaluative judgement

    Open Access•Juan Fischer, Margaret Bearman et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2024

  • Aligning assessment with long‐term learning

    David Boud, Nancy Falchikov•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2006

  • Exploring students’ feedback seeking behavior in the context of programmatic assessment

    Open Access•Liesbeth Baartman, Hanneke Baukema et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2023

  • Assessment for learning

    Eleanor Hawe, Helen Dixon•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2017

  • Assessment planning at the program-level

    Nicholas Charlton, Katie Weir et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2022

  • The whole is greater than the sum of its parts

    Tansy Jessop, Yassein El Hakim et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2014

  • Rethinking models of feedback for learning

    David Boud, Elizabeth Molloy•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2013

  • Using classroom assessment to promote self-regulated learning and the factors influencing its (in)effectiveness

    Open Access•Wenxiao Zhang•Frontiers of Education in China•2017

  • The Impact of Students' Perceptions of Assessment Tasks on Self-Eefficacy and Perception of Task Value

    Open Access•Hussain Alkharusi, Said Suliman Aldhafri et al.•Social Behavior and Personality…•2013

  • The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research

    Joanna Brooks, Serena McCluskey et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2015

  • Formative assessment and self-regulated learning

    David J Nicol, David Nicol et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2006

  • Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner

    Barry J Zimmerman•Theory Into Practice•2002

Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae