The Roles of Planning in Waterfront Redevelopment
From Plan-led and Market-driven Styles to Hybrid Planning
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19383003 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Daniel Galland (0000-0003-2648-806X, Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, autor de correspondencia), Carsten Jahn Hansen (0000-0002-2063-9894) |
| Año | 2012 |
| Volumen | 27 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 203-225 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2012-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Planning Practice and Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0269-7459 • E-ISSN: 1360-0583 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02697459.2012.661669 |
| OpenAlex | W1963904464 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 13 |
| Referencias citadas | 23 |
This paper delves into the different styles and roles that planning adopts in contemporary waterfront redevelopment. Traditionally, waterfront redevelopment practices have consisted of an array of plan-led and market-driven planning styles upon which the derelict areas of post-industrial cities have been transformed. Typical examples from North America and Europe generally tend to focus on the successes that these processes have generated in connection with large-scale and emblematic projects. However, less attention has been devoted to the efforts of a more recent generation of cities undergoing waterfront redevelopment, which often features different planning rationalities, forms of governance, and competing interests. While the precise character of this newer generation does not yet seem defined, the rise of planning practices that combine previous planning styles has been key in allowing these cities achieve their redevelopment aims. In adding to this emerging generation, this paper examines the nature of waterfront redevelopment processes in Aalborg, Denmark, wherein hybrid planning styles characterized bysituation-dependent and relational planning processes have increasingly substituted former practices. The paper concludes that planning adopts different roles depending on the determinants that qualify each redevelopment case, and that hybrid planning may be subjected to public interestdilemmas given its capacity to adapt to certain political and socioeconomic patterns
Architectural engineering · Business · Civil engineering · Environmental planning · Geography · Process management · Redevelopment · Coastal and Marine Management · Engineering · Maritime Ports and Logistics
On the waterfront
Bridging the “consent gap”
Plan changes in Istanbul (Turkey) as project-led practices in a plan-led planning system
Ideological traces in plans for compact cities
Artefactual anchoring’ of strategic spatial planning as persuasive storytelling
Planning for the Public Benefit in the Entrepreneurial City
Development agendas governing the common good – Unfolding planning approaches
Understanding the Planning and Practice of Redeveloping Disused Docklands Using Critical Urban Assemblage as a Lens
Understanding the Planning Challenges of Brownfield Development in Coastal Urban Areas of England
Asserting historical “distinctiveness” in industrial waterfront transformation
Urban collage
The Challenge of the Dutch Port‐City Interface
Waterfront regeneration in Australia
Planning Theory
Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies
City, Capital and Water
Making Better Places
Issues in Waterfront Regeneration
From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism
Culture Stories
European port cities in transition
Extracting Value from the City
Managing the Changing Political Environment in Urban Waterfront Redevelopment
A political economy of the waterfrontier
Global and Local Change on the Port-City Waterfront
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,08 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2014 - 2024 (11) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 12 |