Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Relationship tenure differentially influences pair‐bond behavior in male and female socially monogamous titi monkeys ( Callicebus cupreus )

Bibliographic Data

ID19387128
AuthorsEmily S Rothwell (0000-0002-7791-2695, Neuroscience and Behavior Unit, California National Primate Research Center University of California‐Davis Davis California, corresponding author), Sarah B Carp (Neuroscience and Behavior Unit, California National Primate Research Center University of California‐Davis Davis California), Logan E Savidge (0000-0003-3242-0467, Neuroscience and Behavior Unit, California National Primate Research Center University of California‐Davis Davis California), Sally P Mendoza (Department of Psychology University of California‐Davis Davis California), Karen L Bales (0000-0001-5826-2095, Neuroscience and Behavior Unit, California National Primate Research Center University of California‐Davis Davis California)
Year2020
Volume82
Issue10
Pagese23181-e23181
Publication date2020-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Primatology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0275-2565 • E-ISSN: 1098-2345
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajp.23181
PMID32748458
OpenAlexW3047103285
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited39

Pair‐bonded primates have uniquely enduring relationships and partners engage in a suite of behaviors to maintain these close bonds. In titi monkeys, pair bond formation has been extensively studied, but changes across relationship tenure remain unstudied. We evaluated differences in behavioral indicators of pair bonding in newly formed (~6 months paired, n = 9) compared to well‐established pairs (average 3 years paired, n = 8) of titi monkeys ( Callicebus cupreus ) as well as sex differences within the pairs. We hypothesized that overall males would contribute more to maintenance than females, but that the pattern of maintenance behaviors would differ between newly formed and well‐established pairs. Each titi monkey ( N = 34) participated in a partner preference test (PPT), where the subject was placed in a middle test cage with grated windows separating the subject from the partner on one side and an opposite‐sex stranger on the other side. During this 150‐min behavioral test, we quantified four key behaviors: time in proximity to the partner or stranger as well as aggressive displays toward the partner or stranger. Overall, we found different behavioral profiles representing newly formed and well‐established pair‐bond relationships in titi monkeys and male‐biased relationship maintenance. Males spent ∼40% of their time in the PPT maintaining proximity to the female partner, regardless of relationship tenure. Males from well‐established bonds spent less time (14%) near the female stranger compared to males from newly formed bonds (21%) at the trend level. In contrast, females from well‐established bonds spent less (23%) time near the male partner in the PPT compared to females from newly formed bonds (47%). Aggressive displays were more frequent in newly formed bonds compared to well‐established bonds, especially for females. Scan sampling for homecage affiliation showed that newly formed pairs were more likely to be found tail twining than well‐established pairs

Biology · Cage · Developmental psychology · Pair bond · Primate · Social grooming · Zoology · Demography · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior · Primate Behavior and Ecology · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Parenting costs time

    Open Access•Chloe Karaskiewicz, Chloe L Karaskiewicz et al.•New Directions for Child and…•2021

  • The State of Our Knowledge About Social Knowledge in Platyrrhine Primates

    Open Access•Federico Sánchez Vargas, Thore J Bergman et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2026

  • Initial compatibility during a “Speed‐Dating” test predicts postpairing affiliation in titi monkeys ( Plecturocebus cupreus )

    Open Access•Alexander Baxter, Allison R Lau et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2023

  • Group size and stability

    Open Access•Donna Robbins, Colin A Chapman et al.•Primates•1991

  • Social monogamy, male–female relationships, and biparental care in wild titi monkeys (Callicebus discolor)

    Open Access•Andrea Spence‐Aizenberg, Andrea Spence-Aizenberg et al.•Primates•2016

  • Within-species differences in primate social structure

    Open Access•Colin A Chapman, Jessica M Rothman•Primates•2009

  • Vocal regulation of inter- and intragroup spacing during boundary encounters in the titi monkey,Callicebus moloch

    Open Access•J Gregg Robinson•Primates•1981

  • Monogamy in Mammals

    Devra G Kleiman•The Quarterly Review of Biology•1977

  • The Evolution of Social Monogamy in Mammals

    Open Access•Dieter Lukas, T H Clutton‐Brock et al.•Science•2013

  • Effects of duration of separation on responses to mates and strangers in the monogamous titi monkey (Callicebus moloch)

    Open Access•Eduardo Fernandez‐duque, Eduardo Fernandez-Duque et al.•American Journal of Primatology•1997

  • The Evolution of Parental Care

    T H Clutton‐Brock, T H Clutton-Brock•Evolution of Parental Care•1991

  • Playback responses of socially monogamous black‐fronted titi monkeys to simulated solitary and paired intruders

    Open Access•Christini B Caselli, Daniel J Mennill et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2015

  • Effects of pair bonding on dopamine D1 receptors in monogamous male titi monkeys ( Callicebus cupreus )

    Open Access•Caroline M Hostetler, Katherine Hinde et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2017

  • Demography and life history of wild red titi monkeys ( Callicebus discolor ) and equatorial sakis ( Pithecia aequatorialis ) in Amazonian Ecuador

    Open Access•Sarie Van Belle, Eduardo Fernandez‐duque et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2016

  • Vocal behavior of black‐fronted titi monkeys ( Callicebus nigrifrons )

    Open Access•Christini B Caselli, Daniel J Mennill et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2014

  • Development of a partner preference test that differentiates between established pair bonds and other relationships in socially monogamous titi monkeys ( Callicebus cupreus )

    Open Access•Sarah B Carp, Emily S Rothwell et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2016

  • Why “monogamy” isn't good enough

    Open Access•Stacey R Tecot, B Singletary et al.•American Journal of Primatology•2016

  • Comparative studies of social behavior in Callicebus and Saimiri

    Open Access•Gustl Anzenberger, Sally P Mendoza et al.•American Journal of Primatology•1986

  • Grooming behavior in the titi monkey ( Callicebus torquatus )

    Open Access•Warren G Kinzey, P C Wright•American Journal of Primatology•1982

  • Patterns and Trends in Primate Pair Bonds

    Open Access•A Fuentes•International Journal of…•2002

  • Rensch's rule, Bergmann's effect and adult sexual dimorphism in wild monogamous owl monkeys ( Aotus azarai ) of Argentina

    Open Access•Eduardo Fernandez‐duque•American Journal of Physical…•2011

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae