Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Estimation and Inference for Extreme Continuous Treatment Effects

Bibliographic Data

ID19417954
AuthorsWei Huang (0000-0002-5095-3972, The University of Melbourne), Shuo Li (0000-0002-1633-6444, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, corresponding author), Liuhua Peng (0000-0002-5431-8079, The University of Melbourne)
Year2025
Volume43
Issue4
Pages822-834
Publication date2025-10-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Business and Economic Statistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0735-0015 • E-ISSN: 1537-2707
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/07350015.2024.2430293
OpenAlexW4404525907
LanguageEN
References cited35

This article studies estimation and inference for the treatment effect in deep tails of the potential outcome distributions corresponding to a continuously valued treatment, namely the extreme continuous treatment effect. We consider two measures for the tail characteristics: the quantile function and the tail mean function defined as the conditional mean beyond a quantile level. Then, for a quantile level close to 1, we define the extreme quantile treatment effect (EQTE) and extreme average treatment effect (EATE), which are, respectively, the ratios of the quantile and tail mean at different treatment statuses. We propose estimators for the EQTE and EATE based on tail approximations from the extreme value theory. Our limiting theory is for the EQTE and EATE processes indexed by a set of quantile levels and pairs of different treatment statuses. It facilitates uniform inference for the EQTE and EATE over multiple tail levels and multiple treatment effects. Simulations suggest that our method works well in finite samples, and an empirical study illustrates its practical merits

Econometrics · Economics · Estimation · Inference · Statistics · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Computer Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Mathematics · Statistical Methods and Inference · Artificial Intelligence

  • Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation

    Alberto Abadie, Matias D Cattaneo•Annual Review of Economics•2018

  • Power Laws in Economics and Finance

    Xavier Gabaix•Annual Review of Economics•2009

  • The Propensity Score with Continuous Treatments

    Open Access•Keisuke Hirano, Guido W Imbens•Wiley Series in Probability and…•2004

  • Causal Inference With General Treatment Regimes

    Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•Journal of the American…•2004

  • Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score

    Open Access•Keisuke Hirano, Guido W Imbens et al.•Econometrica•2003

  • Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Journal of the American…•1984

  • Covariate balancing propensity score for a continuous treatment

    Celeste Fong, Christian Fong et al.•The Annals of Applied Statistics•2018

  • The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1983

  • A Unified Framework for Specification Tests of Continuous Treatment Effect Models

    Wei Huang, Oliver Linton et al.•Journal of Business and Economic…•2022

  • Returns to Education

    James J Heckman, John Eric Humphries et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2018

  • Dollars on the Sidewalk

    Open Access•Carly Urban, Sarah Niebler•American Journal of Political…•2013

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae