On “Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predictable”

Gonçalves and Ng propose an interesting and simple way to improve counterfactual imputation methods when errors are predictable. For unconditional analyses, this approach yields smaller mean-squared error and tighter prediction intervals in large samples, even if the dependence of the errors is misspecified. For conditional analyses, this approach corrects the bias of standard methods, and provides valid asymptotic inference, if the dependence of the errors is correctly specified. In this comment, we first discuss how the assumptions imposed on the errors depend on the model and estimator adopted. This enables researchers to assess the validity of the assumptions imposed on the structure of the errors, and the relevant information set for conditional analyses. We then propose a simple sensitivity analysis in order to quantify the amount of misspecification on the dependence structure of the errors required for the conclusions of conditional analyses to be changed

Counterfactual thinking · Econometrics · Missing data · Statistics · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Statistical Methods and Inference

• Synthetic Difference-in-Differences

  Dmitry Arkhangelsky, Susan Athey et al.•American Economic Review•2021

  Add to list

• Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified Parameters

  Open Access•Guido W Imbens, Charles F Manski•Econometrica•2004

  Add to list

• Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predictable

  Sílvia Gonçalves, Śılvia Gonçalves et al.•Journal of Business and Economic…•2024

  Add to list