A Comment on "Jesus the Bodhisattva"
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19428848 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jae-Ryong Shim (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 191 |
| Publication date | 1996-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Buddhist-Christian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0882-0945 • E-ISSN: 1527-9472 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1390167 |
| OpenAlex | W2318511674 |
| Language | EN |
I have witnessed thus far three different approaches to the Buddhist-Christian dialogue among academicians in Korea: one quasi-historical, another comparative-historical, and the third Professor Hee-Sung Keel's nonhistorical and universal approach. As a student of Buddhism, I have always wondered what would be an appropriate way of reconciling the conflicting claims of the two most influential religions in modern Korea. Now I believe that Keel's article could be utilized as the most effective
Art · Bodhisattva · Buddhism · Theology · Chinese history and philosophy · Philosophy · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
| Highly cited | No |
|---|