Towards more explicit means of assessing controversial research literatures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19430004 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dick J Bierman (0000-0002-1697-7778, University of Humanistic Studies), Eva Lobach (University of Humanistic Studies) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 291-295 |
| Publication date | 2007-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Humanistic Psychologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0887-3267 • E-ISSN: 1547-3333 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08873260701415447 |
| OpenAlex | W2074630224 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
This is a discussion of the article ''Finding and correcting flawed research literatures.(Delgado-Romero & Howard, 2005). A number of weaknesses in the evaluation method that was proposed are pointed out and an improved more quantitative evaluation method based upon Bayesian statistics is proposed
Bayesian inference · Bayesian probability · Bayesian statistics · Econometrics · Economics · Epistemology · Management science · Strengths and weaknesses · Computer Science · Mathematics · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2007 - 2007 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |