Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Patient, facility, and community determinants of timely follow up after abnormal screening mammograms in Appalachia

A multilevel analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID19433274
AuthorsRoger T Anderson (0000-0001-8112-4117, University of Virginia Cancer Center, corresponding author), Marianne M Hillemeier (0000-0002-7726-0754, Pennsylvania State University), Jennifer A Harvey (0000-0001-9131-3974, University of Rochester Medicine), Fabian T Camacho (Department of Public Health Sciences University of Virginia School of Medicine Charlottesville Virginia USA), Fabian Camacho (0000-0002-4878-0283, University of Virginia), Gloribel Bonilla (0000-0003-4272-1191, University of Virginia Cancer Center), Cara B Safon (0000-0001-6183-7750, Boston University), C J Louis (Boston University), Chris Louis (Department of Health Law Policy, and Management Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA)
Year2026
Volume42
Issue1
Pagese70104-e70104
Publication date2026-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Rural Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0890-765X • E-ISSN: 1748-0361
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jrh.70104
PMID41502300
OpenAlexW7119003902
LanguageEN
References cited39

PURPOSE: Examine the extent that community and organizational characteristics influence mammogram recall and biopsy rates in Appalachia. METHODS: We collected facility survey and Medicare claims (2016-2018) data on 191 FDA-registered breast imaging organizations serving 2.65 million women in 5 Appalachian states (KY, OH, PA, VA, and WV). Primary outcomes were recall rates and time to recall and biopsy. Generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMM) (patient level with facility random intercepts) and facility-level structural equation models were used to evaluate multilevel predictors of recall, biopsy, and timeliness. Imaging center service areas (SAs) were constructed using Medicare claims for patient, facility, and community characteristics utilization patterns. Mammogram service capacity was measured using a published tool (BIOPSI). FINDINGS: Rural centers had SAs with higher area deprivation index (ADI) scores, lower capacity despite possessing more machines per capita, and were less likely to offer 3D tomosynthesis (3DT). Recall (8%) and biopsy (∼22%) rates were similar by metropolitan status; however, rural centers were more likely to provide same-day exams (P = .021). In GLMM, patient-level predictors included younger age and nonuse of 3DT for recall; and higher ADI and use of 3DT for biopsy. Days to recall was lengthened with dual Medicaid insurance, 3DT, and screening by a stand-alone facility; while days to biopsy was lengthened without the use of 3DT. Community-level pathways were found for days to recall, with rural and smaller facilities achieving significantly fewer days. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of rural imaging centers influence efficiency through their resources and community contexts and should be considered in breast cancer screening outcomes research

Breast cancer · Breast cancer screening · Cancer · Mammography · Mammography screening · Multilevel model · Public health · Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Radiology practices and education

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • The Breast‐Imaging Operations, Practices and Systems Inventory

    Open Access•Roger T Anderson, Marianne M Hillemeier et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2024

  • Cancer Disparities in Rural Appalachia

    Open Access•Nengliang Yao, Héctor E Alcalá et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2017

  • Area Deprivation and Widening Inequalities in US Mortality, 1969–1998

    Gopal K Singh•American Journal of Public Health•2003

  • Accuracy of Diagnostic Mammography at Facilities Serving Vulnerable Women

    Lee Goldman, L Elizabeth Goldman et al.•Medical Care•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae