Tilhørsforhold og danskhed. Debatten om kønsopdelt svømning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19436640 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Verena Lenneis (0000-0002-3072-3790, Aalborg University), Sine Agergaard (0000-0003-2658-8933, Aalborg University) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 45-63 |
| Publication date | 2019-09-22 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dansk Sociologi (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0905-5908 • E-ISSN: 2246-4026 |
| Publisher | Copenhagen Business School (PUBLISHER • DK) |
| DOI | 10.22439/dansoc.v29i3.5804 |
| OpenAlex | W2980877184 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 18 |
I 2016 og 2017 skabte kvindesvømning – et tilbud, der tiltrækker mest, men ikke udelukkende etniske minoritetskvinder – intens debat i hele Danmark. Denne artikel fokuserer på den politiske debat i Aarhus Byråd, der førte til en beslutning om, at der i kommunens svømmehaller ikke må være kønsopdelt svømning i den offentlige åbningstid. Formålet med artiklen er at undersøge, hvordan en fritidsaktivitet som kvindesvømning blev til et problem i 2016, som krævede en langvarig debat og et politisk indgreb. Med udgangspunkt i Nira Yuval-Davis’ begreber om politisering af tilhørsforhold viser vores analyse, hvordan forestillinger om danskhed og dertilhørende danske værdier gøres til centrale argumenter i den politiske debat, som fører til politisk regulering af en velbesøgt sundhedsfremmende fritidsaktivitet. Debatten om kønsopdelt svømning understreger, at værdier såsom individuel valgfrihed eller religionsfrihed, som indtil for nyligt prægede den politiske praksis i nordiske velfærdsregimer, afløses af danskhed som den altoverskyggende værdiramme. ENGELSK ABSTRACT Verena Lenneis & Sine Agergaard: The debate about gender-segregated swimming: belonging and Danishness In 2016 and 2017, women-only swimming – an initiative that attracts mostly, but not exclusively minority ethnic women – caused considerable discussion across Denmark. This article focuses on the year-long political debate in the city council of Aarhus which subsequently led to a ban on women-only swimming activities during public opening hours in the municipality’s indoor swimming pools. The aim of this article was to examine why a leisure time activity such as women-only swimming became a ‘problem’ in 2016, and how it became subjected to political regulation. Drawing on Nira Yuval-Davis’ politics of belonging, our analysis shows how imaginations of ‘Danishness’ and, in particular, Danish values became central arguments in the political debate that led to the regulation of a well-attended and health-promoting leisure activity. The debate on gender-segregated swimming emphasizes that values such as freedom of choice or freedom of religion, which until recently have dominated the political practice in Nordic welfare regimes, are replaced by ‘Danishness’ as the paramount political concern. Keywords: gender, ethnicity, religion, belonging, integration
Theology · European and International Law Studies · Gender Politics and Representation · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Philosophy
Politics, Religion and Gender
The politics of belonging intersectional contestations
Intersektionalitet som sociologisk begreb
Intersectionality, Citizenship and Contemporary Politics of Belonging
A case study on the experiences of university-based Muslim women in physical activity during their studies at one UK higher education institution
Multiple voices
Dutch Women are Liberated, Migrant Women are a Problem
Belonging and the politics of belonging
Beyond national models
Between nationalism and civilizationism
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Imagined communities
An “Integrating Enclave
Belonging and Unbelonging from an Intersectional Perspective
From Immigrant to Transmigrant
The headscarf debates
Denmark between liberalism and nationalism
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |