Evert Beth vs. Anton Reichling
Contrary forces in the rise of Dutch generativism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19437384 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Els Elffers-Van Ketel (University of Amsterdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Pages | 89-100 |
| Publication date | 2006-11-09 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistics in the Netherlands (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0929-7332 • E-ISSN: 1569-9919 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/avt.23.11elf |
| OpenAlex | W2533523303 |
| Language | EN |
In this article, I discuss a remarkable element in the introduction of generative grammar in the Netherlands, namely the prominent role of the philosopher Evert Beth (1908Beth ( -1964)), professor of Logic at the University of Amsterdam. His Constanten van het wiskundige denken (Constants of mathematical thought), which was both presented as a paper and published in 1963, was a major pro-Chomskyan contribution in the struggle to establish generative grammar at the University of Amsterdam. The plea for an algorithmic approach to grammar by a renowned mathematical logician and his rather devastating criticism of his anti-Chomskyan colleague Anton Reichling , professor of General Linguistics, became impressive weapons in the hands of a young and pro-Chomskyan generation of Dutch linguists, especially those in Amsterdam
Art · Humanities · Linguistics · Historical Influence and Diplomacy · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Highly cited | No |
|---|