Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Medical stakeholder perspectives on implementing a computerized battery to identify neurocognitive impairments among youth in Botswana

Bibliographic Data

ID19440541
AuthorsAmelia E Van Pelt (0000-0002-5671-7479, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, corresponding author), Elizabeth D Lowenthal (0000-0002-3855-8646, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA), Onkemetse Phoi (0000-0002-6717-0640, Botswana-Baylor Children’s Clinical Centre of Excellence, Gaborone, Botswana), Ontibile Tshume (0000-0003-1635-6215, Botswana-Baylor Children’s Clinical Centre of Excellence, Gaborone, Botswana), Mogomotsi Matshaba (0000-0002-6441-1218, Botswana-Baylor Children’s Clinical Centre of Excellence, Gaborone, Botswana), Rinad S Beidas (0000-0001-6056-6071, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics)
Year2022
Volume34
Issue12
Pages1513-1521
Publication date2022-12-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAIDS Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0954-0121 • E-ISSN: 1360-0451
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09540121.2021.1990202
PMID34663144
OpenAlexW3207581621
LanguageEN
References cited39

exposure, common in Sub-Saharan Africa, are associated with pediatric neurocognitive impairment. Cognitive screening can identify impairments, but it is rarely used in this setting. The Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (PennCNB), an evidence-based cognitive screening tool, was adapted for use in Botswana. To facilitate future implementation, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted to elicit key stakeholders' perspectives on factors likely to be related to successful uptake of the PennCNB in clinical settings. An integrated analytic approach combining constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and modified grounded theory was used. Results underscore the need for cognitive screening in Botswana and the acceptability of the PennCNB. Implementation barriers include limited time and resources, whereas facilitators include standard procedures for introducing new tools into medical settings and for training implementers. Recommended implementation strategies include integrating screening into the existing workflow, implementing the tool in the medical and educational sectors, and targeting selection of children for assessment. This research addresses the research-to-practice gap by engaging in pre-implementation inquiry and designing for implementation. Results will inform the development of strategies to maximize the likelihood of successful implementation of the PennCNB to identify neurocognitive impairment in children in this high-need setting

Cognition · Medical education · Neurocognitive · Process management · Psychiatry · Public relations · Stakeholder · Workflow · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Computer Science · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Infant Development and Preterm Care · Medicine · Psychology

  • The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers

    Johnny Saldaña•The Coding Manual for Qualitative…•2025

  • Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance

    Open Access•Thomas J Waltz, Byron J Powell et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings

    Open Access•Rosalind E Keith, Jesse C Crosson et al.•Implementation Science•2017

  • A refined compilation of implementation strategies

    Open Access•Byron J Powell, Thomas J Waltz et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Null

    Open Access•null null•Philosophy study•2016

  • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)

    A Jaure, A Tong et al.•International Journal for Quality…•2007

  • Interrater reliability

    Open Access•Marry L McHugh•Biochemia Medica•2012

  • Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based health innovations in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Elizabeth Leonard, Imke de Kock et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2020

  • The effectiveness and cost implications of task-shifting in the delivery of antiretroviral therapy to HIV-infected patients

    Open Access•Noreen Dadirai Mdege, Stanley Chindove et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2013

  • Interventions for children with neurocognitive impairments in resource-limited settings

    Open Access•Amelia E Van Pelt, Matthew I Lipow et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2020

  • Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research

    Open Access•Elizabeth H Bradley, Leslie A Curry et al.•Health Services Research•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae