Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conservation implications of protected areas’ coverage for Paraguay’s reptiles

Bibliographic Data

ID19445993
AuthorsPier Cacciali (0000-0002-3263-8813, Universidad Columbia del Paraguay, corresponding author), Howard Cabral (0000-0002-0320-9411, Guyra Paraguay), Hugo Cabral, Alberto Yanosky (0000-0003-4642-2340, Guyra Paraguay), Alberto A Yanosky
Year2015
Volume21
Issue2
Publication date2015-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePARKS (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0960-233X • E-ISSN: 2411-2119
PublisherIUCN (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2305/iucn.ch.2014.parks-21-2pc.en
OpenAlexW4231210390
LanguageEN
References cited4

In Paraguay the highest rate of deforestation was reached in the 2000s, and in some places protected areas are the only remnant of the original ecosystem structure. Paraguay currently has 57 protected areas amounting to 15.2 per cent of the country under protection. In this paper we assess the effectiveness of the Paraguayan system of protected areas (SINASIP) for reptiles' conservation. We generate a matrix of taxa areas according to 1,789 records for 182 taxa. Areas with the highest number of documented species were Reserva Ecolgica Banco San Miguel y Baha de Asuncin and Reserva de Recursos Manejados u Guaz. Eleven protected areas showed no records. Some species are widely distributed in the country and present in several protected areas, but in other cases numerous species have never been recorded in the protected areas. Three nationally (Phalotris nigrilatus, Philodryas agassizii, and Rhachidelus brazili) and one globally (Philodryas livida) threatened species are currently without protection in Paraguay, as well as the endemic species Homonota rupicola, Ophiodes luciae, Phalotris normanscotti, and Phalotris nigrilatus. At present 90.1 per cent of the total reptiles are found in at least one protected area in the country. Additionally, we show how sampling effort is biased and concentrated around the capital city; and thus a better systematic sampling of the whole country should be considered. Beyond the legal protection provided by protected areas and the strategies to conserve species and their populations, an analysis of the effectiveness of protected areas should be undertaken to secure conservation in perpetuity

Agroforestry · Environmental protection · Geography · Amphibian and Reptile Biology · Animal and Plant Science Education · Environmental Science · Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation

  • Mapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation

    Open Access•Rennie Naidoo, Robin Naidoo et al.•PLOS Biology•2006

  • The performance and potential of protected areas

    Open Access•James E M Watson, Nicole Dudley et al.•Nature•2014

  • Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities

    Open Access•Norman Myers, Russell A Mittermeier et al.•Nature•2000

  • High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change

    Open Access•Matthew C Hansen, Peter Potapov et al.•Science•2013

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae