Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Large‐scale expansion of marine protected area networks

Lessons from Australia

Bibliographic Data

ID19446108
AuthorsJames Fitzsimons (0000-0003-4277-8040, Australian Wildlife Conservancy, corresponding author), James A Fitzsimons, Geoff Wescott (Deakin University)
Year2018
Issue24.2
Pages19-34
Publication date2018-11-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePARKS (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0960-233X • E-ISSN: 2411-2119
PublisherIUCN (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2305/iucn.ch.2018.parks-24-2jaf.en
OpenAlexW2913690049
LanguageEN
References cited2

© 2018, IUCN - International Union for the Conservation of Nature. All rights reserved. Australia was one of the first countries to declare a marine protected area (MPA) in 1879, but it was not until the 1960s and 1970s, in efforts to protect the Great Barrier Reef, that marine protection was considered in a concerted way. The more recent development of MPA networks (or systems) by governments in state, territory and national (Commonwealth) jurisdictional waters has again placed Australia in the global spotlight in MPA development. We assembled the experiences of MPA representatives from government agencies, non-government organisations, academia and industry (in the form of commissioned written book chapters) to describe various aspects of MPAs in Australia, from the history, successes and challenges in creating jurisdictional networks, to the science, economics and legal aspects of Australian MPA networks, to different sectoral perspectives. Key themes are discussed and include: 1) Marine protected areas are always contested (at first), 2) Jurisdiction-wide network declaration versus single MPA declarations, each have pros and cons, 3) For federal systems of government, coordination between the jurisdictions is important, 4) Fishery reserves as the first MPAs ‘muddy the waters’ for the objectives of modern MPAs, 5) A multitude of categories and zones and uses has also confused the MPA concept, 6) Multi-use versus no take: proving the benefits and the need for clear targets for each type, 7) Acknowledging the gap between pure science and realpolitik in the placement of MPAs, 8) Involvement of Indigenous communities in MPAs has been slower than for terrestrial protected areas but improving. The recent and substantial changes to the Australian Government’s historic 2012 declaration of a network of MPAs across its exclusive economic zone are also discussed

Biology · Cartography · Environmental resource management · Geography · Marine protected area · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · Environmental Science · Marine animal studies overview · Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies · Ecology · Geology · Oceanography

  • Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features

    Open Access•Graham J Edgar, Rick D Stuart‐Smith et al.•Nature•2014

  • Strategic public land use assessment and planning in Victoria, Australia

    Open Access•Brandon Coffey, Brian Coffey et al.•Land Use Policy•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae