Endogeneity
A Reply to Two Different Perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19446600 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert H Chenhall (a Monash University , Australia, corresponding author), Frank Moers (0000-0001-6338-5348, b Maastricht University , The Netherlands) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 217-221 |
| Publication date | 2007-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Accounting Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0963-8180 • E-ISSN: 1468-4497 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09638180701269913 |
| OpenAlex | W2071316451 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
In this paper, we provide a short reply to Larcker and Rusticus (this issue) and van Lent (this issue), both of whom comment on the Chenhall and Moers (this issue) paper (hereafter ‘CM’) on endogen
Business · Econometrics · Economics · Endogeneity · Economic theories and models · Economic Theory and Institutions · Economic Theory and Policy · Psychology · Accounting
| Highly cited | No |
|---|