Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Who Drives Market Access for Genetically Modified Organisms and Products in Korea? A Political Economy Approach to Sustainable Development

Bibliographic Data

ID19450306
AuthorsBongsuk Sung (0009-0005-3584-4144, Woosong University, corresponding author), Ki-Kwan Yoon (Chungnam National University), KiKwan Yoon (Chungnam National University, corresponding author), Seunghun Yu (Woosong University), Seung-Hun Yu (Woosong University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume21
Issue2
Pages271-295
Publication date2016-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0971-7218 • E-ISSN: 0973-0796
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0971721816640629
OpenAlexW2417748967
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited49

This study explores the definition of the industrial use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), factors that affect it, and how it influences a firm’s economic performance to understand who drives market access for GMOs and GM products, considering the two premises related to sustainable development: 1) the continuing use of GMOs is one of the most prominent driving forces behind a bio-based economy’s growth, and 2) social system members seek protection from the potential risks of GMOs. The results show compelling evidence of a structural relationship between sociopolitical/economic pressures and economic performance. Additionally, these pressures vary by industry, and activities to secure both social and economic legitimacy due to these pressures have a positive impact on overall firm performance

Business · Economic system · Economics · Genetically modified organism · Industrial organization · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Sustainable development · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development

  • The Rise, Regulation and Risks of Genetically Modified Insect Technology in Global Agriculture

    Open Access•Sandra Schwindenhammer•Science Technology and Society•2020

  • Modern factor analysis

    Harry Horace Harman•Modern factor analysis•1976

  • What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research

    Open Access•James M Conway, Charles E Lance•Journal of Business and Psychology•2010

  • The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis

    Open Access•Susanna Hornig Priest, Heinz Bonfadelli et al.•Risk Analysis•2003

  • Societal aspects of genetically modified foods

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, L Frewer et al.•Food and Chemical Toxicology•2004

  • Corporate Social Performance Revisited

    Donna J Wood•Academy of Management Review•1991

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations.I

    Talcott Parsons•Administrative Science Quarterly•1956

  • Public Opinion, Risk Assessment, and Biotechnology

    Open Access•Jerome S Legge, Robert F Durant•Review of Policy Research•2010

  • Interregional sustainability

    Open Access•Meidad Kissinger, William E Rees et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2011

  • A Social Contract for Biotechnology

    Open Access•Donald Bruce, Donald M Bruce•Journal of Agricultural and…•2002

  • A Typology to Categorize the Ideologies of Actors in the Sustainable Development Debate

    Open Access•Kathryn Davidson•Sustainable Development•2011

  • Factors underlying support or opposition to biotechnology among Australian food consumers and implications for retailer-led food regulation

    Open Access•Stewart Lockie, Geoffrey Lawrence et al.•Food Policy•2005

  • Stakeholder attitudes toward GMOs in the Philippines, Mexico, and South Africa

    Open Access•Philipp Aerni, Thomas Bernauer•World Development•2006

  • Public Opinion, Risk Perceptions, and Genetically Modified Food Regulatory Policy

    Open Access•Robert F Durant, Jerome S Legge•European Union Politics•2005

  • Factors Influencing People’s Acceptance of Gene Technology

    Open Access•Melanie Connor, Michael Siegrist•Science Communication•2010

  • Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies

    Open Access•Chul-Joo Lee, Chul‐joo Lee et al.•Science Communication•2005

  • Organizational Legitimacy

    John B Dowling, John Dowling et al.•The Pacific Sociological Review•1975

  • The Iron Cage Revisited

    P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae