Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reliability of standard circumferences in domain‐related constitutional applications

Bibliographic Data

ID19459298
AuthorsTresignie Jonathan (Department of Experimental Anatomy Vrije Universiteit Brussel Laarbeeklaan 103 1090 Brussels Belgium), Jonathan Tresignie (0000-0002-7085-535X, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, corresponding author), Aldo Scafoglieri (0000-0002-9692-9513, Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Scafoglieri Aldo (Department of Experimental Anatomy Vrije Universiteit Brussel Laarbeeklaan 103 1090 Brussels Belgium), Clarys Jan Pieter (Department of Experimental Anatomy Vrije Universiteit Brussel Laarbeeklaan 103 1090 Brussels Belgium), Erik Cattrysse (0000-0003-4325-9576, Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Cattrysse Erik (Department of Experimental Anatomy Vrije Universiteit Brussel Laarbeeklaan 103 1090 Brussels Belgium)
Year2013
Volume25
Issue5
Pages637-642
Publication date2013-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Human Biology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1042-0533 • E-ISSN: 1520-6300
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajhb.22423
PMID23907753
OpenAlexW1519874577
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited32

OBJECTIVES: There may be no doubt that circumferences, measured at different sites of body segments, have a variety of applications. Studies using girths are based on assumed logic, but within a general context no literature is found as to the origin of choice of a particular circumference for a particular application. The purpose of this study is to relate each circumference (i) with the segmental tissue masses and (ii) with all whole-body tissue masses; in order to provide a complete constitutional reliability report of each girth available. METHODS: Subsequent to an anthropometric protocol, 23 (9 male aged 74.8 ± 5.7 years and 14 female aged 79.2 ± 7.3 years) well-preserved white Caucasian cadavers, of lean subjects were dissected according to the 5-component model and expressed on its tissue-system level, for example, skin, muscle, adipose tissue, viscera, and bones. RESULTS: The relations range from r = 0.80 to r = 0.99 (P < 0.01). A majority of circumferences (e.g., head, neck, upper thigh, mid-thigh, and calf) do represent what is expected. Other girths (e.g., waist, upper arm, elbow, forearm, and wrist) do not relate adequately to the assumed constituent. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the appreciation of the waist circumference. This measure is not valid for lean individuals, but might be for the obese. It is suggested likewise that a combination of chest and hip circumference may have a more general application within the public health sector. In summary, evidence confirms the reliability of a series of circumferences but creates doubts or rejects other colloquially established perimeters

Adipose tissue · Anthropometry · Biology · Circumference · Forearm · Obesity · Thigh · Waist · Body Composition Measurement Techniques · Body Contouring and Surgery · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Mathematics · Medicine · Anatomy · Internal Medicine

  • Measuring calf circumference

    Open Access•Gülistan Bahat•2021

  • Waist‐to‐hip ratio and adipose tissue distribution

    Open Access•Mark Daniel, Alan Martin et al.•American Journal of Human Biology•2003

  • Human body composition

    Open Access•Jan Pieter Clarys, Alan Martin et al.•American Journal of Human Biology•1999

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae