Accounting for measurement error in human life history trade‐offs using structural equation modeling
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19460937 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Samuli Helle (0000-0002-6216-3759, Section of Ecology, Department of Biology University of Turku, 20014 Finland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2018-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Human Biology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1042-0533 • E-ISSN: 1520-6300 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ajhb.23075 |
| PMID | 29130592 |
| OpenAlex | W2767468812 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 40 |
OBJECTIVES: Revealing causal effects from correlative data is very challenging and a contemporary problem in human life history research owing to the lack of experimental approach. Problems with causal inference arising from measurement error in independent variables, whether related either to inaccurate measurement technique or validity of measurements, seem not well-known in this field. The aim of this study is to show how structural equation modeling (SEM) with latent variables can be applied to account for measurement error in independent variables when the researcher has recorded several indicators of a hypothesized latent construct. METHODS: As a simple example of this approach, measurement error in lifetime allocation of resources to reproduction in Finnish preindustrial women is modelled in the context of the survival cost of reproduction. In humans, lifetime energetic resources allocated in reproduction are almost impossible to quantify with precision and, thus, typically used measures of lifetime reproductive effort (e.g., lifetime reproductive success and parity) are likely to be plagued by measurement error. These results are contrasted with those obtained from a traditional regression approach where the single best proxy of lifetime reproductive effort available in the data is used for inference. RESULTS: As expected, the inability to account for measurement error in women's lifetime reproductive effort resulted in the underestimation of its underlying effect size on post-reproductive survival. CONCLUSIONS: This article emphasizes the advantages that the SEM framework can provide in handling measurement error via multiple-indicator latent variables in human life history studies
Biology · Econometrics · Inference · Latent variable · Observational error · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Birth, Development, and Health · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Computer Science · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Mathematics · Artificial Intelligence
Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems
Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models
Causality
Pleiotropy, Natural Selection, and the Evolution of Senescence
The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things
Three Cs in measurement models
Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling
Manifest variable path analysis
Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry
Evolution of senescence
Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models?
Structural Equations with Latent Variables
Is there a trade‐off between fertility and longevity? A comparative study of women from three large historical databases accounting for mortality selection
Reproduction and lifespan
The effect of number of births on women's mortality
The impact of reproduction on gambian women
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
A Unified Approach to Measurement Error and Missing Data
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |