Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Judges' Reliance on Psychological, Sociological, and Legal Variables in Contested Custody Decisions

Bibliographic Data

ID19464481
AuthorsErik Sorensen (0000-0001-7473-6991, Oregon State Hospital), Jacquelin Goldman (University of Florida), Lisa Sheeber (0000-0003-1293-943X, Oregon Research Institute), Liana Albanese (University of Florida), Martin Ward (University of Florida), Linda Williamson, Cindy McDanal (University of Florida)
Year1997
Volume27
Issue1-2
Pages1-24
Publication date1997-08-11
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Divorce & Remarriage (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1050-2556 • E-ISSN: 1540-4811
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1300/j087v27n01_01
OpenAlexW2037495403
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited24

Judges' use of case specific data in determining child custody arrangements was examined. Information collected on 60 contested initial disposition or disposition modification cases was used to model judicial decision-making. The sample was not representative of the full population of divorcing families in that it was disproportionately comprised of high conflict cases in which there were few unequivocally safe placement options. Our results indicated that judges generally followed the legal statutes, attended to the nature of family relationships, and did not rely on a general preference for one parent. Moreover, they demonstrated a strong reliance on the impressions and recommendations of Guardian Ad Litcm personnel. However, some notably important case information was not weighted heavily in judges' decisions. In particular, information regarding the degree of parental conflict, consistently found to be very important to post-divorce child adjustment, did not appear to be used by judges in these cases. Moreover, neither parental substance abuse nor a history of child abduction by a parent influenced decision-making. Implications of these findings are discussed

Child custody · Criminology · Disposition · Family court · Guardian · Judicial opinion · Political science · Population · Sociology · Statute · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Law · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology

  • Positions Taken by Judges and Custody Experts on Issues Relating to the Best Interests of Children in Custody Disputes in Québec

    Élisabeth Godbout, Claudine Parent et al.•International Journal of Law…•2015

  • Le meilleur intérêt de l’enfant dont la garde est contestée

    Open Access•Élisabeth Godbout, Claudine Parent et al.•Enfances Familles Générations•2014

  • Judging the Best Interests of the Child

    Open Access•Julie E Artis•Law & Society Review•2004

  • The Long-Term Effects of Divorce on Children

    Open Access•Judith S Wallerstein•Journal of the American Academy…•1991

  • Guardian Ad Litem Volunteers as Reporters of Family Characteristics in Contested Custody Cases

    Erik Sorensen, Jacquelin Goldman et al.•Journal of Divorce & Remarriage•1994

  • Impact on children of abduction by a parent

    Geoffrey L Greif, Rebecca L Hegar•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•1992

  • Father Custody and Social Development in Boys and Girls

    Open Access•John W Santrock, Richard A Warshak•Journal of Social Issues•1979

  • Post‐Divorce Family Relationships as Mediating Factors in the Consequences of Divorce for Children

    Open Access•Robert D Hess, Kathleen A Camara•Journal of Social Issues•1979

  • Children's adjustment in joint and sole physical custody families

    Marsha Kline, Jeanne M Tschann et al.•Developmental Psychology•1989

  • The role of paternal variables in divorced and married families

    Amanda McCombs Thomas, Rex Forehand•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•1993

  • Joint custody

    Andre P Derdeyn, Elizabeth Scott•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•1984

  • Parental divorce and the well-being of children

    Paul R Amato, Bruce Keith•Psychological Bulletin•1991

Citations per year0.14
Citation span2004 - 2015 (12)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae