Life cycle performance and carbon handprint of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19466822 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pablo Busch (0000-0002-9069-1401, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy), Yunzhu Chen (Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy), Alissa Kendall (0000-0003-1964-9080, University of California, Davis, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s44498-026-00112-1 |
| OpenAlex | W7165532951 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
Electrifying the transport sector will require manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries and extensive mining of their embedded critical minerals, like lithium. Research has quantified the future demand for lithium-ion batteries, their constituent materials and their environmental impacts, but typically without contextualizing these impacts within the benefits of fleet-level decarbonization. We conduct a life cycle assessment of the United States projected light-duty electric vehicle fleet (2025–2050) and compare it to a counter-factual scenario where all electric vehicles are instead internal combustion engine vehicles to determine the environmental benefits enabled by lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. Results show that electric vehicles will reduce primary energy consumption by 20%, material extraction (including fossil fuels) by 34% and carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 e) emissions by 61% compared to an internal combustion engine-only future. This translates into 300–600 kg CO 2 e avoided per kilowatt-hour of lithium-ion battery, or 5–12 tons CO 2 e avoided per kg of lithium extracted. Under conditions of high battery recycling rates, avoided emissions can increase to 20 tons CO 2 e per kg of lithium. However, electric vehicle deployment increases metal extraction by 117% and critical minerals extraction by 179%. Actions to reduce the metal intensity of EVs are needed such as increasing LIB durability, improving EV energy efficiency, and enhancing battery recycling and metal recovery rates to avoid new mining and multiply the climate benefits of battery mineral extraction
Battery electric vehicle · Battery pack · Combustion · Electric vehicle · Energy consumption · Fossil fuel · Greenhouse gas · Internal combustion engine · Life-cycle assessment · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Extraction and Separation Processes · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Trade risks to energy security in net-zero emissions energy scenarios
University handprint framework
Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles
A product–component framework for modeling stock dynamics and its application for electric vehicles and lithium‐ion batteries
Trade, extended use, and end of life in the Global South
Effects of demand and recycling on the when and where of lithium extraction
| Highly cited | No |
|---|