Economic Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment
The State of the Art and Discussion of Examples
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19467356 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fulvio Ardente (0000-0002-2461-4475, European Union, corresponding author), Maurizio Cellura (0000-0003-4908-1385) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 387-398 |
| Publication date | 2012-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00434.x |
| OpenAlex | W1900802305 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 43 |
This article examines methods for analyzing allocation in life cycle assessment (LCA); it focuses on comparisons of economic allocation with other feasible alternatives. The International Organization for Standardization's (ISO) guideline 14044 indicates that economic allocation should only be used as a last resort, when other methods are not suitable. However, the LCA literature reports several examples of the use of economic allocation. This is due partly to its simplicity and partly to its ability to illustrate the properties of complex systems. Sometimes a price summarizes complex attributes of product or service quality that cannot be easily measured by physical criteria. On the other hand, economic allocation does have limitations arising, for example, from the variability of prices and the low correlation between prices and physical flows. This article presents the state of the debate on the topic and some hypothetical examples for illustration. A general conclusion is that it is not possible to determine one “best” allocation method. The allocation procedure has to be selected on a case‐by‐case basis and no single approach is suitable for every situation. Despite its limitations, economic allocation has certain qualities that make it flexible and potentially suitable for different contexts. In some situations, economic allocation should not be the last methodological resort. The option of economic allocation should be considered, for example, whenever the prices of coproducts and coservices differ widely
Business · Cost allocation · Economics · Environmental economics · Management science · Operations research · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Climate and air pollution impacts of generating biopower from forest management residues in California
The global environmental paw print of pet food
OrbitShare
Comparative life cycle assessment of heterotrophic microalgae Schizochytrium and fish oil in sustainable aquaculture feeds
When Do Allocations and Constructs Respect Material, Energy, Financial, and Production Balances in LCA and Eeio
Choice of Allocations and Constructs for Attributional or Consequential Life Cycle Assessment and Input‐Output Analysis
Unified Theory of Allocations and Constructs in Life Cycle Assessment and Input‐Output Analysis
Evaluation of Life Cycle Assessment Recycling Allocation Methods
Effects of Using Heterogeneous Prices on the Allocation of Impacts from Electricity Use
From variance to value
In Search of a Consistent Solution to Allocation of Joint Production
Balance issues in input–output analysis
Environmental Footprints of Agriculture Embodied in International Trade
Ecological footprint of nations
Influence of Inventory Data Sets on Life‐Cycle Assessment Results
Response to Weinzettel
Understanding Who is Responsible for Pollution
Avoiding Co‐Product Allocation in Life‐Cycle Assessment
Avoiding Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment Revisited
An Ecological Economic Critique of the Use of Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment Research
| Citations per year | 1.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Highly cited | No |