Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Americans' Nanotechnology Risk Perception

Assessing Opinion Change

Bibliographic Data

ID19467794
AuthorsSara Smiley-Smith (0000-0002-7549-5090), Sara E Smiley Smith, H Dean Hosgood (0000-0003-4151-1133), Hung Chak Ho (0000-0002-6505-3504, Cancer Institute (WIA)), Evan S Michelson (0000-0002-9707-027X, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars), Meredith H Stowe (Yale University)
Year2008
Volume12
Issue3
Pages459-473
Publication date2008-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00032.x
OpenAlexW2034754837
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited8

Although proposed nanotechnology applications hold great promise, little is known about the potential associated risks. This lack of clarity on the level of risk associated with nanotechnology has forced people to make decisions about consumption with incomplete information. A national random digit dialing telephone survey ( N = 1014) was conducted in the United States to assess knowledge of nanotechnology and perception of risk in August 2006. This investigation looks critically at individuals' responses to questions about the balance of risks and benefits of nanotechnology, both at the outset of the survey and after respondents were given a brief introduction to the potential benefits and risks of the technology. Models were created to characterzise respondents who said they did not know how nanotechnology's risks and benefits balanced in the “preinformation” condition but who, in the postinformation condition, had a different opinion. Respondents who were highly educated, members of the Republican Party, or male were more likely to switch from “don't know” in the preinformation condition to “benefits outweigh risks” in the postinformation condition, whereas respondents who were less educated, members of the Democratic Party, or female were more likely to switch from “don't know” in the preinformation condition to “risks outweigh benefits” in the postinformation condition. This is the first study to our knowledge to develop a significant model of nanotechnology risk perception change, specifically with regard to gender differences. The power of information provision to sway opinions is also supported, highlighting the importance of developing educational efforts targeting vulnerable populations

Business · CLARITY · Environmental health · Perception · Political science · Public relations · Risk perception · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management

  • Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology

    Open Access•Nidhi Gupta, A R H Fischer et al.•NanoEthics•2015

  • Explaining Gender Differences in Concern about Environmental Problems in the United States

    Chenyang Xiao, Aaron M Mccright•Society & Natural Resources•2012

  • Precaution in Practice

    Open Access•Aasgeir Helland, Hans Kastenholz et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2008

  • Toward Green Nano

    Open Access•Matthew J Eckelman, Julie B Zimmerman et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2008

  • Nanotechnology

    Open Access•Roland Clift, Shannon Lloyd•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2008

  • Public perception of nanotechnology

    Open Access•Ankita Rathore, G Mahesh•Technology in Society•2021

  • Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, Carmen Keller et al.•Risk Analysis•2007

  • Gender Differences in Risk Perception

    Open Access•Per Gustafson, Per E Gustafson•Risk Analysis•1998

  • Financial Decision-Making

    Renate Schubert, Martin Brown et al.•American Economic Review•1999

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2008 - 2021 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae