Crushing it…? A first national mapping of the Norwegian construction aggregates system using Material Flow Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19467831 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonna Ljunge (0009-0000-2995-309X, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Mark U Simoni (0000-0002-9253-9569, Geological Survey of Norway), Leiv Jørgen Tofte Husøy (Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Daniel B Müller (0000-0001-7747-9011, Norwegian University of Science and Technology) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 297-310 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s44498-026-00021-3 |
| OpenAlex | W7135022008 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 32 |
Norway produces and consumes construction aggregates—sand, gravel, and crushed rock—at one of the highest per capita rates in Europe while increasingly challenged by local resource constraints, longer transportation, and inefficient material use. Yet, the national system governing aggregate management has remained largely unexplored. This study applies a national-scale Material Flow Analysis to quantify the production, use, and end-of-life pathways of aggregates in Norway in 2021. Our model draws on diverse data sources and novel estimation approaches to integrate mined crushed and natural aggregates, construction excavation materials (CEMs), and aggregates occurring in manufactured materials and construction and demolition waste. Findings reveal that Norway produced over 90 Mt of mined aggregates—equivalent to 16.7 t per capita—of which 30% were exported. The domestic demand of 12.8 t per capita was largely met by crushed rock, with road infrastructure accounting for the largest share of stock inputs. Excavation in construction generated at least 28.7 Mt of CEMs, yet only 20% substituted mined aggregates in building and infrastructure applications. Less than 10% of end-of-life aggregates re-entered the system, indicating low circularity. Our findings highlight key data gaps, especially regarding CEMs, and underscore the potential of excavation materials to enhance resource efficiency. By providing a comprehensive overview of the Norwegian aggregates system, this study offers essential insights for sustainable resource management. It emphasizes the critical role of robust maps of material systems, information sharing, and project-scale material coordination to reduce environmental impacts and enable circular construction practices. This article met the requirements for a gold-gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges
Demolition · Excavation · Industrial ecology · Material flow analysis · Natural resource · Norwegian · Per capita · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use
A looming tragedy of the sand commons
Reducing material use and their greenhouse gas emissions in Greater Oslo
Maintenance and Expansion
Global distribution of material inflows to in‐use stocks in 2011 and its implications for a circularity transition
A Material Flow Accounting Case Study of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area using the Urban Metabolism Analyst Model
Machine learning‐based stocks and flows modeling of road infrastructure
Global Patterns and Trends for Non‐Metallic Minerals used for Construction
Do we have enough natural sand for low‐carbon infrastructure
The Weight of Society Over Time and Space
Mapping sand flows and stocks
Sand, gravel, and UN Sustainable Development Goals
Analysis of material stock accumulation in China’s infrastructure and its regional disparity
Construction minerals as part of an urban circular economy? A multi-scalar study of the city of Oslo and its hinterland
From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |