Environmental Impact and Added Value in Forestry Operations in Norway
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19468301 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ottar Michelsen (0000-0001-7141-1948, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Christian Solli (NTNU Samfunnsforskning), Anders Hammer Strømman (0000-0003-2987-5583, NTNU Samfunnsforskning) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 69-81 |
| Publication date | 2008-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00008.x |
| OpenAlex | W2060679878 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 15 |
The forestry sector is experiencing an increasing demand for documentation about its environmental performance. Previous studies have revealed large differences in environmental impact caused by forestry operations, mainly due to differences in location and forestry practice. Reliable information on environmental performance for forestry operations in different regions is thus important. This article presents a case study of forestry operations in Norway. Environmental impact and value added of selected operations were assessed. This was done with a hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. Main results, including a sensitivity analysis, are presented for a set of four impact categories. The production chain assessed included all processes from seedling production to the delivery of logs to a downstream user. The environmental impact was mainly caused by logging, transport by forwarders, and transport by truck. These three operations were responsible for approximately 85% of the total environmental impact. The contribution to value added and total costs were more evenly distributed among the processes in the value chain. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the difference in environmental impact between the worst case scenario and the best case scenario was more than a factor of 4. The single most important process was the transport distance from the timber pile in the forest to the downstream user. The results show that the environmental impact from forestry operations in boreal forests was probably underreported in earlier studies
Business · Economics · Environmental impact assessment · Environmental resource management · Forest management · Geography · Life-cycle assessment · Logging · Truck · Engineering · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Environmental Science · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management · Forest Management and Policy · Ecology · Forestry
Greenhouse gas emission impacts of use of Norwegian wood pellets
Towards nexus-based governance
Hybridization of complete PLCA and MRIO databases for a comprehensive product system coverage
Life Cycle Assessment of Biomass-based Combined Heat and Power Plants
Environmental Assessment of Wood‐Based Biofuel Production and Consumption Scenarios in Norway
Applying Leontief's Price Model to Estimate Missing Elements in Hybrid Life Cycle Inventories
Impact Assessment of Biodiversity and Carbon Pools from Land Use and Land Use Changes in Life Cycle Assessment, Exemplified with Forestry Operations in Norway
Life Cycle Assessment of Second Generation Bioethanols Produced From Scandinavian Boreal Forest Resources
Life Cycle Assessment of Electric and Fuel Cell Vehicle Transport Based on Forest Biomass
Carbon footprint and sustainability assessment of wood utilisation in Hungary
A risk index for multicriterial selection of a logging system with low environmental impact
Forest certification—an instrument to promote sustainable forest management?
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Applying Leontief's Price Model to Estimate Missing Elements in Hybrid Life Cycle Inventories
Environmental and economic impacts of substitution between wood products and alternative materials
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.61 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2023 (16) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |