Investigating Reasons for Differences in the Results of Environmental, Physical, and Hybrid Input‐Output Models
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19468622 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sai Liang (0000-0001-5776-2768, State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, corresponding author), Tianzhu Zhang (0000-0002-4439-4334, Tsinghua University) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 432-439 |
| Publication date | 2013-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jiec.12010 |
| OpenAlex | W2158800800 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 29 |
It is vital to find reasons for differences in the results of environmental input‐output (EIO), physical input‐output (PIO), and hybrid input‐output (HIO) models for industrial and environmental policy analysis. Using EIO, PIO, and HIO models, China's industrial metabolism is calculated. Four reasons were found to account for differences in the results of analysis using EIO, PIO, and HIO models: the manner in which they deal with residential consumption, service sectors, and waste recycling, and the assumption of unique sector prices. The HIO model, which treats residential consumption as sectors of the intermediate delivery matrix, is preferred to the EIO and PIO models for analyzing industrial and environmental policies. Moreover, waste recycling in five sectors—agriculture; the manufacture of paper, printing, and articles for culture, education, and sports activities; the manufacture of nonmetallic mineral products; smelting and pressing of metals; and construction—should be comprehensively considered when using the HIO model to study problems related to these five sectors. Improvements in the EIO, PIO, and HIO models and future work are also discussed
Agriculture · Business · Economics · Environmental economics · Industrial ecology · Sustainability · Engineering · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis · Sustainable Industrial Ecology · Ecology
Can life-cycle assessment produce reliable policy guidelines in the building sector
A novel maximum entropy approach to hybrid monetary-physical supply-chain modelling and its application to biodiversity impacts of palm oil embodied in consumption
Quantifying the global cropland footprint of the European Union’s non-food bioeconomy
Dynamics of the water‒energy‒cropland nexus in China from 2007 to 2017
Assessing mining‐related land footprints of global steel use with a global physical input–output model
Trading Land
Developing the Chinese Environmentally Extended Input‐Output (Ceeio) Database
Supply versus use designs of environmental extensions in input–output analysis
Effects of Using Heterogeneous Prices on the Allocation of Impacts from Electricity Use
Measuring telecouplings in the global land system
Input-Output Analysis
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Companies on the Scale
Input‐Output Analysis of Waste Management
Extending the Boundaries of Life‐Cycle Assessment through Environmental Economic Input‐Output Models
Achieving Dewaterization in Industrial Parks
The Waste Input‐Output Approach to Materials Flow Analysis
Data Acquisition for Applying Physical Input-Output Tables in Chinese Cities
Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States
Physical and monetary input–output analysis
An improved input–output model for energy analysis
A note on the calculus for physical input–output analysis and its application to land appropriation of international trade activities
Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological–economic model
Applying physical input–output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,91 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |