Eco‐Efficiency Analysis of a Lithium‐Ion Battery Waste Hierarchy Inspired by Circular Economy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19468995 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kirti Richa (Golisano Institute for Sustainability Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY USA), Callie W Babbitt (0000-0001-5093-2314, Golisano Institute for Sustainability Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY USA, corresponding author), Gabrielle Gaustad (0000-0002-1481-0333, Golisano Institute for Sustainability Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY USA) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 715-730 |
| Publication date | 2017-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jiec.12607 |
| OpenAlex | W2615265737 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 63 |
A circular economy (CE)‐inspired waste management hierarchy was proposed for end‐of‐life (EOL) lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) from electric vehicles (EVs). Life cycle eco‐efficiency metrics were then applied to evaluate potential environmental and economic trade‐offs that may result from managing 1,000 end‐of‐life EV battery packs in the United States according to this CE hierarchy. Results indicate that if technology and markets support reuse of LIBs in used EVs, the net benefit would be 200,000 megajoules of recouped cumulative energy demand, which is equivalent to avoiding the production of 11 new EV battery packs (18 kilowatt‐hours each). However, these benefits are magnified almost tenfold when retired EV LIBs are cascaded in a second use for stationary energy storage, thereby replacing the need to produce and use less‐efficient lead‐acid batteries. Reuse and cascaded use can also provide EV owners and the utility sector with cost savings, although the magnitude of future economic benefits is uncertain, given that future prices of battery systems are still unknown. In spite of these benefits, waste policies do not currently emphasize CE strategies like reuse and cascaded use for batteries. Though loop‐closing LIB recycling provides valuable metal recovery, it can prove nonprofitable if high recycling costs persist. Although much attention has been placed on landfill disposal bans for batteries, results actually indicate that direct and cascaded reuse, followed by recycling, can together reduce eco‐toxicity burdens to a much greater degree than landfill bans alone. Findings underscore the importance of life cycle and eco‐efficiency analysis to understand at what point in a CE hierarchy the greatest environmental benefits are accrued and identify policies and mechanisms to increase feasibility of the proposed system
Business · Circular economy · Economics · Environmental economics · Hierarchy · Industrial ecology · Reuse · Sustainability · Waste management · Advanced battery technologies research · Engineering · Extraction and Separation Processes · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
The role of design in circular economy solutions for critical materials
Evolution Characters and Influencing Factors of Regional Eco-Efficiency in a Developing Country
Advancing the Study of Circular Entrepreneurship
Quantifying the impact of digital product passport deployment under the EU battery regulation on China's EoL EV battery recycling
Enabling a viable circular ecosystem for electric vehicle batteries
Analytical groundwork for circular economy roadmaps based on a soft systems approach
Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries
A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns
Taking the Circularity to the Next Level
A social life cycle assessment of vanadium redox flow and lithium‐ion batteries for energy storage
Circular battery production in the EU
Can circular economy strategies address resource constraints for lithium‐ion batteries? A comprehensive dynamic material flow analysis of lithium flows in China's battery sector
Life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion battery recycling using pyrometallurgical technologies
Should high‐cobalt EV batteries be repurposed? Using LCA to assess the impact of technological innovation on the waste hierarchy
Circular function deployment
Comparative life cycle GHG emission analysis of conventional and electric vehicles in India
| Citations per year | 1.78 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |