Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contributions of extended batch tests for assessing technical recyclability

A case study of low‐value battery flows

Bibliographic Data

ID19469304
AuthorsPaul Martin Mählitz (0000-0002-9749-2667, Chair of Circular Economy and Recycling Technology Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany, corresponding author), Nathalie Korf (0000-0002-0770-660X, Chair of Circular Economy and Recycling Technology Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany), Georgios Chryssos (Stiftung Gemeinsames Rücknahmesystem Batterien Hamburg Germany), Vera Susanne Rotter (0000-0001-9300-7292, Chair of Circular Economy and Recycling Technology Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume26
Issue3
Pages1061-1077
Publication date2022-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/jiec.13250
OpenAlexW4221089224
LanguageEN
References cited23

Good product recyclability is a prerequisite for the transition to a circular economy. However, today's product complexity and diversity in the urban mine result in heterogeneous and variable waste flows affecting process recycling efficiency (RE) and thus product recyclability. For batteries, waste flow composition and subsequent RE are determined by usage behavior, collection, and sorting into chemical battery subsystems. This study aims to demonstrate how extended batch tests (EBTs) can be used as a method to (a) determine battery‐specific RE and (b) derive recommendations for assessing and improving the recyclability of batteries. Three EBTs comprising extensive characterization methods were carried out with mixtures of zinc‐based (AZ) and lithium‐based (LIB) batteries. The results showed that 0.20–0.27 kg/kg of the input mass was lost through flue gas and not recyclable. The metal fraction (0.15–0.19 kg/kg) was easily recyclable, while the mineral fractions of LIBs posed challenges for recycling and recovery (RR) due to the high elemental heterogeneity and pollutants originating from individual battery subsystems. In total, 0.79 kg/kg of AZs was recyclable, whereas 0.52 kg/kg of LIBs and 0.58 kg/kg of AZLIBs (a mixture of both) were recyclable after further treatment. In conclusion, the study demonstrated how the EBT approach can be used to extend recyclability assessment by providing waste flow characteristics for comparison with output quality requirements, enabling assignment of battery‐specific RE and identification of poorly recyclable battery subsystems. Thus, the EBT approach can help improve and assess technical recyclability in the future

Algorithm · Material flow analysis · Process engineering · Sorting · Waste management · Advanced battery technologies research · Chemistry · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Science · Extraction and Separation Processes · Mathematics · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques

  • Toward a cell‐chemistry specific life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion battery recycling processes

    Open Access•Marit Mohr, Jens F Peters et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2020

  • Common Misconceptions about Recycling

    Open Access•Roland Geyer, Brandon Kuczenski et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2016

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae