Higher-Order Theories of Consciousness and the Heidelberg Problem
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19475459 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Josh Weisberg (0009-0007-0857-8666, corresponding author), ProtoSociology Project |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Pages | 340-357 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | ProtoSociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1434-4319 |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/protosociology20193613 |
| OpenAlex | W3014209960 |
| Language | EN |
It is widely held that consciousness is partially constituted by a “pre-reflective” self-consciousness. Further, it’s argued that the presence of pre-reflective self-consciousness poses a problem for “higher-order” theories of consciousness. Higher-order theories invoke reflective representation and so do not appear to have the resources to explain pre-reflective self-consciousness. This criticism is rooted in the Heidelberg School’s deep reflection on the nature of self-consciousness, and accordingly, I will label this challenge the “Heidelberg problem.” In this chapter, I will offer a higher-order answer to the Heidelberg problem. Instead of attacking the problem head-on, I’ll argue that the view can explain why there appears to be a Heidelberg problem, even if consciousness is ultimately realized by higher-order representation. But I’ll also argue that the theory has indexical resources to more directly counter the Heidelberg problem. Either way, I hope to show that the higher-order theory survives its trip to Heidelberg
Cognitive science · Consciousness · Criticism · Electromagnetic theories of consciousness · Epistemology · Political science · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|