Causal Decision Theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19475573 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ellery Eells (corresponding author), ProtoSociology Project |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 159-180 |
| Publication date | 1999-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | ProtoSociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1434-4319 |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/protosociology19991312 |
| OpenAlex | W2737827750 |
| Language | EN |
After a brief presentation of evidential decision theory, causal decision theory, and Newcomb type prima facie counterexamples to the evidential theory, three kinds of defenses of the evidential theory are discussed. Each has its weaknesses, but one of them seems stronger than the other two. The weaknesses of the best of the three, and the intricacy of metatickle analysis, does not constitute an advantage of causal decision theory over the evidential theory, however. It is argued, by way of an example, that causal decision theory also stands in need of a metatickle defense
Business decision mapping · Causal decision theory · Decision analysis · Evidential reasoning approach · Mathematical economics · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|