Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Confucianism, Puritanism, and the Transcendental

China and America

Bibliographic Data

ID19475672
AuthorsThorsten Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten Botz–bornstein (0000-0003-3664-2219, corresponding author), ProtoSociology Project
Year2011
Volume28
Pages153-172
Publication date2011-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueProtoSociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1434-4319
PublisherPhilosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.5840/protosociology20112827
OpenAlexW2466094063
LanguageEN

Max Weber examined Chinese society and European Puritanism at the beginning of the Twentieth Century in order to find out why capitalism did not develop in China. He found that Confucianism and Puritanism are mutually exclusive, which enabled him to oppose both in the form of two different kinds of rationalism. I attempt neither to refute nor to confirm the Weberian thought model. Instead I show that a similar model applies to Jean Baudrillard’s vision of American culture, a culture that he determined in terms of hyperreality. Instead of rejecting Weber’s thoughts right away, I give Weber’s model a further push and show that through a further twist that “Western culture” has received within particular American constellations, Weber’s understanding of Confucianism and Baudrillard’s understanding of American civilization manifest amazing similarities

Epistemology · Transcendental number · Chinese history and philosophy · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae