Limits to New Public Governance in Türkiye
The case of the 6 February 2023 earthquakes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19477691 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Asuman Göksel (0000-0002-2016-7460, Middle East Technical University, corresponding author), Ozan Zengin (0000-0002-2610-9114, Ankara University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-30 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-25 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Management Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1471-9037 • E-ISSN: 1471-9045 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14719037.2026.2678390 |
| OpenAlex | W7162407317 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 63 |
This article examines the limits to New Public Governance in Türkiye by asking why the NPG-like disaster management architecture could not be effectively translated into service delivery following the 6 February 2023 earthquakes. Suggesting establishing a link between political dynamics and NPG, the article argues that the Turkish case is an example of ‘instrumental NPG’, where the NPG appears as a politically constructed façade lacking its substantive features. To explicate, trust is employed as a mediating variable to identify the politically conditioned practices of participation and collaboration during the emergency response phase of the 6 February earthquakes
Corporate governance · Public policy · Public sector · Disaster Management and Resilience · Turkey's Politics and Society · Turkish Urban and Social Issues
Public Governance as Co-creation
The New Public Governance?
Toward a Politics of Disaster
Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services
Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services
What’s in a Name? Grasping New Public Governance as a Political-Administrative System
The New Public Governance? 1
Future directions in disaster governance
Exploring network mechanisms to organizations’ influence reputation
Developing New Public Governance as a public management reform model
Do network management and trust matter for network outcomes? A meta-analysis and research agenda
Network governance and collaborative governance
Facilitating collaboration in publicly mandated governance networks
Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development
Building a Competitive Authoritarian Regime
Governance crises and resilience of authoritarian populism
Disaster Governance
The politics of recentralisation
Repairing public trust through communication in health crises
Research on Politics of Disaster Risk Governance
Authoritarian neoliberalism, crisis, and consolidation
Reproducing authoritarian neoliberalism in Turkey
Understanding the moral economy of state-civil society relationships
Understanding Co-Production as a Policy Tool
Proliferation of neopatrimonial domination in Turkey
Some Critical Notes on “Governance”
Interagency Communication Networks During Emergencies
The Structure of Effective Governance of Disaster Response Networks
Public Service Motivation and Trust in Government
Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey
Populism and Public Administration
Statecraft on cement
Collaborative governance in strong state settings
Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey
Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism
Modes of Network Governance
New Political Governance in Westminster Systems
The effects of executive constraints on political trust
Open government and citizen empowerment in authoritarian states
Authoritarian consolidation dynamics in Turkey
Cronyism through Financialization
Complexing Governance Styles
| Highly cited | No |
|---|