The General and the Particular in Memory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19477994 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Bauckham (1Emeritus Professor, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom, [email protected], corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 28-51 |
| Publication date | 2016-07-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1476-8690 • E-ISSN: 1745-5197 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/17455197-01401004 |
| OpenAlex | W2512618731 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Dale Allison’s book Constructing Jesus begins by describing how memory often leads us astray. As a basic principle for the quest of the historical Jesus, he claims that the general is remembered better than the particular. This article argues that Allison has misunderstood the results of research on memory in cognitive psychology. There is no reason to think that specific events are remembered less well than generalities. Allison fails to distinguish different types of memory and fails to discuss what sorts of events are remembered well. There is strong evidence that memories of “exceptional” events (characterized by uniqueness, importance, emotionality and frequent rehearsal) are especially well retained. The exorcism stories in the Gospels are briefly discussed as an example
Art · Biblical studies · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Emotionality · Epistemology · Exorcism · Historical Jesus · Literature · Psychoanalysis · Memory Processes and Influences · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |