Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Justice, money or both

Idea and the need for a definitive cause of action for counsel fees

Bibliographic Data

ID19478490
AuthorsDean J Musto (Hofstra University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume64
Issue2
Pages473-486
Publication date2026-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFamily Court Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1531-2445 • E-ISSN: 1744-1617
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/fcre.70065
OpenAlexW7137301978
LanguageEN

Federal law allows either the parents or the opposing school district to reclaim attorney's fees upon winning a due process hearing. However, the Circuits of the United States Courts of Appeals are divided on if a fees action is either ancillary or independent from the special education litigation due to Congressional silence. When the Circuits adopted different state limitation periods from state law, it created varying results across the nation. This note explores the Circuit divide and proposes an amendment to federal legislation creating a definitive statutory period and considers a pendente lite approach to the hearing discovery process

Cause of action · Legislation · State law · Statutory law · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Legal Issues in Education · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae