Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What do I not know? How does AI affect critical thinking

Bibliographic Data

ID19480263
AuthorsBeth Weaver (0000-0003-1711-1068, University of Strathclyde, corresponding author), Fern Gillon (University of Strathclyde), Ian Belton (0000-0002-2479-6563, University of Strathclyde), Gavin Heron (0000-0002-2238-1532, University of Strathclyde)
Year2026
Publication date2026-05-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCriminology & Criminal Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-8958 • E-ISSN: 1748-8966
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17488958261453600
OpenAlexW7162940758
LanguageEN
References cited53

Effective and ethical risk assessment in criminal justice depends on practitioners’ critical thinking and professional curiosity, yet both are constrained by structural, relational and emotional pressures. The rapid proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) introduces new opportunities and challenges in probation practice. Drawing on data from 16 practitioners who participated in exploratory, interactive workshops, this study examined how practitioners engaged with ChatGPT when completing an actuarial risk assessment, and how these interactions influenced their critical thinking. Participants identified potential benefits, including reduced cognitive load through idea generation, support in articulating justifications, and assistance in structuring complex information. However, they also highlighted risks, particularly the potential for cognitive offloading, over‐reliance on AI outputs, and diminished critical scrutiny in contexts characterised by time pressure and uncertainty. The article discusses these preliminary findings in relation to wider debates on human–AI interaction and the conditions under which LLMs may augment, or undermine, professional judgement

Cognition · Criminal justice · Critical thinking · Scrutiny · Structuring · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Human Factors and Ergonomics

  • Cognitive Offloading

    Open Access•Evan F Risko, Sam J Gilbert•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2016

  • Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory

    Fred Paas, Juhani E Tuovinen et al.•Educational Psychologist•2003

  • Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding

    Open Access•Michelene T H Chi, Michelene T H et al.•Cognitive Science•1994

  • Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design

    Open Access•John Sweller•Learning and Instruction•1994

  • ChatGPT

    Open Access•Partha Pratim Ray•Internet of Things and…•2023

  • Artificial Intelligence in Social Work

    Frederic G Reamer•International Journal of Social…•2023

  • Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction

    Paul Chandler, John Sweller•Cognition and Instruction•1991

  • Confirmation Bias

    Open Access•Raymond S Nickerson•Review of General Psychology•1998

  • AI-based chatbot interactions and critical thinking skills

    Open Access•Rosa Angela Fabio, Alessio Plebe et al.•Current Psychology•2025

  • From Theory to Practice

    Adam Szulewski, Daniel Howes et al.•Academic Medicine•2021

  • The influence of artificial intelligence within health-related risk work

    Open Access•Patrick Brown, Roanne Van Voorst•Health Risk & Society•2024

  • Professionalism in Probation

    Matt Tidmarsh•Professionalism in Probation•2021

  • AI Tools in Society

    Open Access•Michael Gerlich•Societies•2025

  • Risk and punishment

    Open Access•Robert Werth•Sociology Compass•2019

  • Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject

    Open Access•Kelly Hannah‐moffat, Kelly Hannah-Moffat•Punishment & Society•2004

  • Exploring risk management in probation practice

    Open Access•Gwen Robinson•Punishment & Society•2002

  • Theorizing the Performative Effects of Penal Risk Technologies

    Open Access•Robert Werth•Social & Legal Studies•2018

  • Negotiated Risk

    Open Access•Kelly Hannah‐moffat, Kelly Hannah-Moffat et al.•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2009

  • Theorising Social Work Sense-Making

    Open Access•Duncan Helm•The British Journal of Social Work•2022

  • What does professional curiosity mean to you?’

    Open Access•Jake Phillips, Sam Ainslie et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2022

  • The Role of Uncertainty in Professionals’ Thinking about Children Who Harm Other People

    Open Access•Gavin Heron, Kate Black•The British Journal of Social Work•2023

  • Magic moments’

    Open Access•Paul Michael Garrett•The British Journal of Social Work•2026

  • Social Work and Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Lauri Goldkind•Social Work•2021

  • Inclusion and Exclusion Through Risk-based Justice

    Open Access•Gwen Van Eijk•The British Journal of Criminology•2020

  • Government and Control

    Nikolas Rose•The British Journal of Criminology•2000

  • The Role of Metalearning in Study Processes

    Open Access•J B Biggs, John Biggs•British Journal of Educational…•1985

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae