Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Examination of Factors Affecting Eyewitness Examination in Greece

Bibliographic Data

ID19483563
AuthorsE Anitsi (0000-0001-5785-9762, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, corresponding author), Stelios A Nikopoulos (0009-0007-0139-6333, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), Philip J Candilis (0000-0003-3594-8013, George Washington University)
Year2026
Volume15
Issue5
Pages274
Publication date2026-04-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/socsci15050274
OpenAlexW7155186851
LanguageEN
References cited52

Methods examining eyewitness testimony and its identification of suspects have not received sufficient analysis internationally. In the face of growing empirical evidence of methodologic and judicial errors, Greece’s judicial process nonetheless prioritizes eyewitness testimony in gathering evidence and preparing cases for trial. Due to its pluralistic geographical and cultural position uniting European, Balkan, and Mediterranean influences, and its alignment with non-Napoleonic code nations, Greece is a useful example for studying witness interviewing in evolving judicial systems. Drawing on 87 semi-structured interviews with Greek legal professionals, this study identifies systemic variables affecting eyewitness interviews and suspect identification. Prominent barriers to robust witness interviewing included inappropriate questioning techniques and wording, frequent interruptions, scripted questions, and failure to develop a sense of trust. In identifying suspects, participants highlighted inadequate compliance with defined protocols, inadequate management of negative emotions, pressure on witnesses to make positive identifications, and introduction of improper guidance about the alleged perpetrator. Lengthy delays before the eyewitness interview and a lack of infrastructure were core influences alongside a lack of familiarity with best practices. The findings signal the need for authorities to adopt reliable methods and specific guidance for utilizing eyewitness testimony

Circumstantial evidence · Eyewitness identification · Eyewitness memory · Eyewitness testimony · Interrogation · Interview · Leading question · Suspect · Witness · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Memory Processes and Influences · Radiology practices and education

  • The Greek Penal Code

    Emmanouil Billis•The Greek Penal Code•2017

  • Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence

    Open Access•Gary L Wells, Margaret Bull Kovera et al.•Law and Human Behavior•2020

  • Humane Interrogation Strategies Are Associated With Confessions, Cooperation, and Disclosure

    Open Access•Talley Bettens, Hayley M D Cleary et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2024

  • International Developments and Practices in Investigative Interviewing and Interrogation

    David Walsh, Gavin Oxburgh et al.•International Developments and…•2017

  • Directive Leading Questions and Preparation Technique Effects on Witness Accuracy

    Open Access•Georgina Gous, Jacqueline M Wheatcroft•SAGE Open•2020

  • Sample Sizes for 10 Types of Qualitative Data Analysis

    Open Access•A Wutich, Melissa Beresford et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • The Cognitive Interview

    Amina Memon, Christian A Meissner et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2010

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • The effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification decisions

    Ryan J Fitzgerald, Heather L Price et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2013

  • Assessment of bias in police lineups

    Open Access•Nancy K Steblay, Gary L Wells•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2020

  • How Many Interviews Are Enough

    Open Access•Greg Guest, Arwen Bunce et al.•CAM•2006

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae