An Examination of Factors Affecting Eyewitness Examination in Greece
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19483563 |
|---|---|
| Authors | E Anitsi (0000-0001-5785-9762, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, corresponding author), Stelios A Nikopoulos (0009-0007-0139-6333, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), Philip J Candilis (0000-0003-3594-8013, George Washington University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 274 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/socsci15050274 |
| OpenAlex | W7155186851 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 52 |
Methods examining eyewitness testimony and its identification of suspects have not received sufficient analysis internationally. In the face of growing empirical evidence of methodologic and judicial errors, Greece’s judicial process nonetheless prioritizes eyewitness testimony in gathering evidence and preparing cases for trial. Due to its pluralistic geographical and cultural position uniting European, Balkan, and Mediterranean influences, and its alignment with non-Napoleonic code nations, Greece is a useful example for studying witness interviewing in evolving judicial systems. Drawing on 87 semi-structured interviews with Greek legal professionals, this study identifies systemic variables affecting eyewitness interviews and suspect identification. Prominent barriers to robust witness interviewing included inappropriate questioning techniques and wording, frequent interruptions, scripted questions, and failure to develop a sense of trust. In identifying suspects, participants highlighted inadequate compliance with defined protocols, inadequate management of negative emotions, pressure on witnesses to make positive identifications, and introduction of improper guidance about the alleged perpetrator. Lengthy delays before the eyewitness interview and a lack of infrastructure were core influences alongside a lack of familiarity with best practices. The findings signal the need for authorities to adopt reliable methods and specific guidance for utilizing eyewitness testimony
Circumstantial evidence · Eyewitness identification · Eyewitness memory · Eyewitness testimony · Interrogation · Interview · Leading question · Suspect · Witness · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Memory Processes and Influences · Radiology practices and education
The Greek Penal Code
Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence
Humane Interrogation Strategies Are Associated With Confessions, Cooperation, and Disclosure
International Developments and Practices in Investigative Interviewing and Interrogation
Directive Leading Questions and Preparation Technique Effects on Witness Accuracy
Sample Sizes for 10 Types of Qualitative Data Analysis
The Cognitive Interview
Using thematic analysis in psychology
The effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification decisions
Assessment of bias in police lineups
How Many Interviews Are Enough
| Highly cited | No |
|---|