Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The level of implementing sustainable development goal "Industry, innovation and infrastructure" of Agenda 2030 in the European Union countries

Application of MCDM methods

Bibliographic Data

ID19484172
AuthorsJarosław Brodny (0000-0002-6807-4431, Silesian University of Technology), Magdalena Tutak (0000-0003-4781-8697, Silesian University of Technology)
Year2023
Volume14
Issue1
Pages47-102
Publication date2023-03-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueOeconomia Copernicana (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2083-1277 • E-ISSN: 2353-1827
PublisherInstytut Badan Gospodarczych / Institute of Economic Research (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.24136/oc.2023.002
OpenAlexW4362550191
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited80

Research background: Sustainable development of the modern world represents an opportunity to preserve economic growth and technological progress, as well as social development, without limiting the possibilities of this development for past generations. The directions of this development are included in the 17 goals and 169 tasks of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The achievement of these goals and the implementation of the adopted tasks is a huge challenge for individual countries and regions. This also applies to the European Union (EU), where economic development is closely linked to environmental protection and social inclusion. Of key importance in this context is Objective 9 of Agenda 2030, and thus its level of implementation in the EU-27 countries is the aim of the research presented in this paper. Purpose of the article: The research involved assessing the level of EU countries in terms of building stable infrastructure, promoting sustainable industrialization and fostering innovation, i.e., the main areas of Goal 9 of Agenda 2030. Methods: The assessment was based on the EU?27 countries' sustainable development index (SDG9) determined with the use of 14 indicators characterizing these areas between 2015?2020. The basis of the developed methodology was a multi criteria decision making approach (MCDM methods). TOPSIS, WASPAS and EDAS methods were used to determine the sustainability index, and the Entropy, CRITIC and standard deviation (SD) methods were used to determine weights for the adopted indicators. In addition, the use of the Spearman's and Kendall's Tau non-parametric tests enabled the analysis of the relationship between the SDG9 index and the basic economic, environmental and energy parameters, as well as the digitalization of the countries under study. Findings & value added: The results show that the EU?27 countries vary widely in terms of implementing Sustainable Development Goal 9 of Agenda 2030 over the analyzed period. Now, the most advanced in this respect are Denmark, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Finland, and Sweden. By contrast, substantial problems are found in Bulgaria, Greece, Portugal, and Lithuania. The results also provide an opportunity to trace changes in the value of the designated index in individual countries, and in groups of countries of the "old" and "new" EU. These results significantly enrich the knowledge of the effectiveness of implementing Goal 9 of Agenda 2030 in the EU?27 countries and the relationship between the development of individual countries and sustainable development economy. These findings can also be used to create new EU?27 strategies for sustainable and solidarity-based development of the whole EU. In addition, the results can be helpful to decision-makers as they highlight important indicators related to innovation, industrialization and infrastructure that should be considered when formulating a country's sustainable development strategy. The added value of the study is the research procedure presented, which can be used in analyses on the study of various issues related to sustainable development for other groups of regions

Business · Economic growth · Economic policy · Economics · Environmental economics · European union · Multiple-criteria decision analysis · Operations research · Political science · Sustainability · Sustainable development · TOPSIS · Computer Science · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Engineering · Quality of Life Measurement · Socio-economic Development and Sustainability

  • The economic and environmental dimension of sustainable development and evaluation of selected areas in EU countries

    Open Access•Martina Halásková, Renata Halásková et al.•Economics & Sociology•2025

  • Analysis of financial performance of deposit banks in Turkey using multi-criteria decision-making methods

    Open Access•Hasan Tutar, Hakan Tutar et al.•JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES•2025

  • Preference using Root Value based on Aggregated Normalizations (PROVAN)

    Open Access•Sanjib Biswa, Nibir Khawash et al.•Socio-Economic Planning Sciences•2026

  • How does the circular economy achieve social change? Assessment in terms of sustainable development goals

    Open Access•Dolores Gallardo-Vazquez, Sabina Scarpellini et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Pathways to EU decarbonization

    Open Access•Aleksy Кwilinski, Oleksii Lyulyov et al.•Sustainability Science•2026

  • Statistical assessment of digital transformation in European Union countries under sustainable development goal 9

    Open Access•Barbara Fura, Aneta Karasek et al.•Quality & Quantity•2025

  • Relationship between patenting and economic development – message implied by the Czechoslovakian experience from 1918 to 1991

    Ondřej Dvouletý, Radka Macgregor Pelikánová•Innovation The European Journal…•2025

  • Measurement of Sustainable Development and Standard of Living in Territorial Units

    Open Access•Aleksandra Łuczak, Klára Čermáková et al.•Sustainable Development•2025

  • Sustainability assessment of the agriculture sector using best worst method

    Open Access•Justas Streimikis, Ahmad Bathaei et al.•Sustainable Development•2024

  • Economic and institutional determinants of environmental health and sustainability

    Open Access•Vasile Dinu, Cristian Mihai Dragos et al.•Oeconomia Copernicana•2024

  • Paths to low-carbon development in China

    Open Access•Tingting Bai, Dong Xu et al.•Oeconomia Copernicana•2023

  • A grouping of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and their influence on business results

    Open Access•Inguer Peña, Silvia M Andrade et al.•Oeconomia Copernicana•2023

  • Innovation, researcher and creativity

    Open Access•Luca Rossi, Maria Giovina Pasca et al.•Technology in Society•2024

  • Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950–2005

    Open Access•Adam Szirmai•Structural Change and Economic…•2012

  • Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems

    Open Access•D Diakoulaki, GEORGE MAVROTAS et al.•Computers & Operations Research•1995

  • Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making

    Ching-Lai Hwang, Kwangsun Yoon•Multiple Attribute Decision Making•1981

  • The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

    Open Access•Ricardo Vinuesa, Hossein Azizpour et al.•Nature Communications•2020

  • The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development

    Open Access•E B Barbier•Environmental Conservation•1987

  • Circular economy as assistance for sustainable development in OECD countries

    Open Access•Viktorija Skvarciany, Indrė Lapinskaitė et al.•Oeconomia Copernicana•2021

  • In search of key determinants of innovativeness in the regions of the Visegrad group countries

    Open Access•Elżbieta Roszko‐Wójtowicz, Barbara Dańska-Borsiak et al.•Oeconomia Copernicana•2022

  • Innovative Technological Approach for the Cyclic Nutrients Adsorption by Post-Digestion Sewage Sludge-Based Ash Co-Formed with Some Nanostructural Additives under a Circular Economy Framework

    Open Access•Piotr Sakiewicz, K Piotrowski et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • R&D expenditure and economic growth

    Open Access•Svetlana Sokolov Mladenovic, Svetlana Sokolov-Mladenović et al.•Economic Research-Ekonomska…•2016

  • Infrastructure for sustainable development

    Open Access•Scott Thacker, Daniel Adshead et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • Sustainable Development Goals fail to advance policy integration

    Open Access•Maya Bogers, Felix Biermann et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets

    Open Access•David Le Blanc•Sustainable Development•2015

  • The Importance of Manufacturing in Economic Development

    Open Access•Nobuya Haraguchi, Charles Fang Chin Cheng et al.•World Development•2017

  • Innovation in sustainable development

    Open Access•Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna Szopik‐Depczyńska et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Technological innovation and sustainable development

    Open Access•Anis Omri•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2020

  • The impact of technological innovation and governance institution quality on Malaysia's sustainable growth

    Open Access•Hussain Ali Bekhet, Nurul Wahilah Abdul Latif•Technology in Society•2018

  • Global innovation efficiency assessment of EU member and candidate countries via DEA-Eatwios multi-criteria methodology

    Open Access•Ahmet Aytekin, Fatih Ecer et al.•Technology in Society•2022

  • Innovation in developing countries

    Open Access•Rasmus Lema, Erika Kraemer‐mbula et al.•Innovation and Development•2021

Unique citing works13
Citations per year4,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae