Kesetaraan Gender dalam Pandangan Amina Wadud dan Riffat Hassan

Bibliographic Data

ID19484690
AuthorsMutrofin Mutrofin (Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume3
Issue1
Pages234
Publication date2015-10-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTeosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2088-7957 • E-ISSN: 2442-871X
PublisherState Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.15642/teosofi.2013.3.1.234-266
OpenAlexW2269883187
LanguageEN
Citations received3

This article will explore the similarities and differences between women with conceptually men voiced by Amina Wadud and Riffat Hasan. An important point that can be drawn from this is Amina Wadud thinking that he wants to dismantle the old thinking or even myths caused by biased interpreta-tion of the reconstruction methodology patriarchy through his commentary. Because it is not really in line with the basic principles and spirit of the Qur’ân. The Qur’ân actually very fair in the seated men and women. It’s just that this has become distorted by the presence of a biased interpretation of patriarchy, the more reinforced by the political system and society is very patriarchal. While Riffat Hassan argues that religious texts produced scientists and theologians influenced by a proven classic patriarchal culture. This then led to the emergence of theological arguments were dug from the Qur’ân as the primary text of Islam called feminist theology

Epistemology · History of religions · Islam · Mythology · Patriarchy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Gender and Women's Rights · Gender Studies · Islamic Finance and Communication · Islamic Studies and Radicalism · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Religious studies

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access