Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tarekat and Politics in Indonesia

Contested Authority between Murshids in the Tarekat Qadiriyah wa Naqsyabandiyah in East Java

Bibliographic Data

ID19484868
AuthorsMukhammad Zamzami (0000-0002-2938-7128, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya), Fikri Mahzumi (0000-0003-3388-9048, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya), Abd A’la (0000-0002-4764-3551, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya), Abd A'la
Year2022
Volume12
Issue2
Pages187-208
Publication date2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTeosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2088-7957 • E-ISSN: 2442-871X
PublisherState Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.15642/teosofi.2022.12.2.187-208
OpenAlexW4380086368
LanguageEN
References cited6

This article scrutinizes the dynamics between tarekat and politics in contemporary Indonesia in relation to the contested authority between murshids in the Tarekat Qadiriyah wa Naqsyabandiyah (TQN) in East Java. Using a historical approach, this article analyzes the position, characteristics, and political attitudes of the murshid in Jombang and Surabaya amidst the political currents during the New Order era. This article finds that murshids show adaptation and innovation in responding to challenges in their tarekat hierarchy and political leadership in Indonesia. The political stance of the murshid is considered a rational choice. In East Java, some murshids such as KH. Musta‘in Romli, KH. Adlan Ali, and KH. Usman al-Ishaqi developed different relationships with political organizations. Kiai Musta‘in tried to be adaptive and compromising as he involved in practical politics and joining the ruling party, i.e., Golkar. Kiai Adlan, on the contrary, kept his distance from the ruling regime by joining the Islamic United Development Party (Partai Persatuan Pembangunan/PPP). Kiai Usman, on the other side, remained loyal to the tarekat spirit as he refused to be involved in politics. The difference in political attitudes among the members of TQN has been considered a reflection of the political ijtihād of the murshids. Competition for authority, which resulted in conflict and internal divisions in this tarekat, is a logical consequence of political interests when they meet the tarekat and influence its dynamics

Java · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Computer Science · Education and Character Development · Islamic Finance and Communication · Islamic Studies and Radicalism · Law

  • Modern Sufis and the State

    Katherine Pratt Ewing, Rosemary R Corbett•Modern Sufis and the State•2019

  • The Politics of a Local Sufism in Contemporary Indonesia

    Open Access•Rizqa Ahmadi•Epistemé Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu…•2021

  • Sufism and Anti-Colonial Violent Resistance Movements

    Open Access•Fait Muedini•Open Theology•2015

  • The Tarekat Qadiriyah Wa Naqsyabandiyah in East Java and Islamic Politics in Indonesia

    Endang Turmudı•Asian journal of social science•1998

  • The Khittah of 1926 Reexamined

    Open Access•Ali Munhanif•STUDIA ISLAMIKA•1970

  • The making of Muslim dissent

    Open Access•P Werbner•American Ethnologist•1996

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae