Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Water sharing in South Caucusus

A new geopolitical dimension in Nagorno Karabakh conflict

Bibliographic Data

ID19485477
AuthorsFiruz Suleymanov (0000-0002-5247-1512, Azerbaijan State Pedagogical University), Darío Salinas (0000-0003-2064-2476, Université Paris 8)
Year2026
Volume17
Issue1
Pages137-154
Publication date2026-06-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeopolítica(s) Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2172-7155 • E-ISSN: 2172-3958
PublisherUniversidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5209/geop.94926
OpenAlexW7163869768
LanguageEN
References cited15

Water resources in the South Caucasus are unevenly distributed, and climate change, together with other anthropogenic pressures such as armed conflict, has intensified water-related challenges. While the former Armenia–Azerbaijan conflict has been widely studied, the role of water has remained comparatively understudied from a geopolitical perspective. This article examines how and why water, shaped by environmental conditions as well as socio-economic and cultural practices, functioned as a geopolitical factor in the former conflict over Karabakh. The analysis applies the French geopolitical reasoning approach developed by Yves Lacoste, focusing on multi-scalar processes (local, national, and regional), identifying spatial sets, and comparing competing territorial representations. The findings highlight the strategic importance of infrastructures such as the Sarsang reservoir, whose control and seasonal operation were closely tied to authority, security and representation. They also show how neighbouring powers, including Russia, Türkiye and Iran, shaped the opportunities and constraints for cooperation. Overall, the study demonstrates that water was not peripheral but an integral element of territorial rivalries and

Environmental security · Geopolitics · Water resources · Water security · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Transboundary Water Resource Management · Water Resources and Management

  • Analyzing the Mutual Geopolitical and Security Complementarity of Iran and Turkey

    Ali Omidi, Hande Orhon Özdağ•Journal of Balkan and Near…•2023

  • La géographie, ça sert, d'abord, à faire la guerre

    Yves Lacoste•La géographie, ça sert, d'abord,…•2014

  • Conflict and cooperation along international waterways

    Open Access•A Wolf, Alexander M Wolf•Water Policy•1998

  • Water resources management to achieve sustainable development in Azerbaijan

    Open Access•Elshan Ahmadov•Sustainable Futures•2020

  • The Risks of Hydro-Hegemony

    Halil Burak Sakal•Caucasus Survey•2022

  • Good neighbours or distant relatives?’ Regional identity and cooperation in the South Caucasus

    Tracey German•Central Asian Survey•2012

  • Water and Conflict

    Peter H Gleick•International Security•1993

  • Evolution of Transboundary Politics in the Euphrates-Tigris River System

    Aysegül Kibaroglu, Waltina Scheumann•Global Governance A Review of…•2013

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae