Memorialising Madiba in South Africa
The Role of Graphic Heritage and Toponymy in two Contrasting Urban Places
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19486239 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert G Harland (0000-0002-8334-3417, Loughborough University), Yolandi Burger (0000-0002-5121-9497, Loughborough University), Alison Barnes (0000-0002-0920-2990), Everardt Andre Burger (0000-0002-4645-2075, Tshwane University of Technology) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 17-36 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Public Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2206-9658 • E-ISSN: 2206-9658 |
| Publisher | City Space Architecture (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.32891/jps.v7i1.1571 |
| OpenAlex | W4394818731 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
Hundreds of public places across the world are named in honour of Nelson Mandela. However, there is no consistent level of expectation in terms of what we might learn about this great man when visiting these places. This paper examines an explanatory hypothesis that the process of place naming involving people – and any material representations that then refer to that person – not only offers the opportunity to learn about that person but also impacts one's experience and understanding of place. We refer to these material representations as 'graphic heritage.' We examine two highly contrasting urban places named after Mandela (also known as Madiba by South Africans), namely Nelson Mandela Square in Sandton, Johannesburg, and Nelson Mandela Park in Mamelodi, Pretoria in South Africa. In looking for traces of his values and legacy using graphic heritage, our methodological approach is guided by the design inquiry method of Zeisel, which uses annotated diagrams, observations of physical traces, and photo-documentation of these spaces. We position graphic heritage as an empirical research tool and as a form of critical inquiry that reveals very much (Sandton) and very little (Mamelodi) about the former president and rebel leader. The findings reveal contrasting settings and significantly different levels of access, diverse motivations through the naming acts, and differing levels of attentiveness to the visual-aesthetic considerations shown by those responsible for the two sites
Geography · Political science · African history and culture studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|