Fortifying the Deep Ecology Platform
Nursi’s Tafakkur īmānī as a Metaphysical Completion to Naess’s Deep Questioning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19486394 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Moh Isom Mudin (0009-0005-0843-6735, University of Darussalam Gontor), Nur Hadi Ihsan (0000-0001-7037-8891, University of Darussalam Gontor), Nabila Huringiin (0009-0007-1600-3280, University of Darussalam Gontor) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | e101 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Islamic Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2207-4414 • E-ISSN: 2207-4414 |
| Publisher | Islamic Sciences and Research Academy (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.55831/ajis.v11i3.1057 |
| OpenAlex | W7154289612 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 23 |
The escalating environmental crisis underscores the inadequacy of purely technical solutions, necessitating a fundamental reorientation of humanity’s relationship with nature. This article examines two transformative approaches to this challenge. It first considers Arne Naess’ Deep Ecology, whose method of Deep Questioning effectively repositions humanity within the broader ecological community and establishes a philosophical basis for biocentric equality and the Ecological Self. Naess’ principal achievement lies in developing an inclusive framework that fosters ecological solidarity across diverse traditions. However, the movement’s philosophical openness—its chief strength—simultaneously presents its central limitation: the absence of a definitive metaphysical foundation capable of sustaining long-term environmental commitment. The study, therefore, turns to Bediüzzaman Said Nursi's tawhidic ecology, arguing that its core practice of tafakkur īmānī (contemplation of faith) complements and enhances the Deep Ecology project rather than supplanting it. Grounded in tawḥīd taḥqīqī (verified monotheism) and naẓar ḥarfī (interpreting creation as Divine signification), Nursi’s framework re-conceives the biosphere as a manifestation of Divine Names (tajalliyāt al-asmā’ al-ḥusnā). The resultant synthesis preserves the horizontal-immanent strengths of Naess’ approach while augmenting it with a vertical-transcendent epistemology, thus forging a comprehensive environmental philosophy
Biosphere · Deep ecology · Ecological crisis · Humanity · Metaphysics · Solidarity · Sustainable development · Transformative learning · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Ecology, Community and Lifestyle
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya's Himma
Prison Life in the Eyes of Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and Aleksander Solzhenitsyn
Religions and Environmental Sustainability
Al-Muḥaqqiq al-Iṣfahānī’s Ontological Argument and Spinoza’s Ontological Arguments for the Existence of God
Scientific Qur’anic Exegesis in Indonesia
Eco-Religious Teachings and Environmental Sustainability
Necessary Connection between Laws of Physics and Metaphysics
Purpose-Driven Life in Islam and Emotional Stability
The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement
Feminism and Ecology
Feminism and Ecology” and “Women and Life on Earth
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |