Megaprojects as regime transformers

Analyzing the role of Norway's carbon capture and storage megaproject on port transition to energy hubs

Bibliographic Data

ID19487234
AuthorsNegar Safara Nosar (0000-0001-5867-9966, Vestlandsforsking, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume135
Pages104698
Publication date2026-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnergy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.erss.2026.104698
OpenAlexW7151893595
LanguageEN
References cited36

Positioned at multisystem interfaces enables ports to diversify their services while facilitate decarbonization across maritime and nearby industries by embracing the role of low-carbon energy hubs, and small- and medium-sized ports (SMPs) are no exception to this trend. But empirical studies tend to privilege major ports or compare ports without adequately accounting for inherent differences in type and size. Given their limited yet agile capacity to respond to societal change, I focus on SMPs to explore how their transition unfolds in transformational contexts specifically influenced by low-carbon megaproject development. Megaprojects are large-scale, politicized, regulated initiatives that are conceptualized here as mission-oriented development programs comprising interrelated, coordinated initiatives governed by mission-oriented policies. Empirically, the study examines how Norway's carbon capture and storage (CCS) megaproject shapes SMPs' transition to energy hubs through qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and document review. Findings show that megaprojects entangle multiple systems and build multisystem interfaces across levels, catalyzing interrelated transitions through material, agentic, and institutional interactions. By creating protective spaces for specific technologies, megaprojects shape transition pathways at interfaces, gradually aligned them with regime-level transformation while increasing the risk of path-dependency given megaproject's strong regime interlinkages. This is particularly consequential for SMPs. Despite their limited capacity, strong alignment with megaproject can enable transition despite limited capacities while weak alignment risks stalling it. Yet SMP transitions remain nuanced, shaped by place-specific characteristics and local interlinkages. For policymakers, this highlights a critical tension: while megaprojects accelerate transition, they also heighten lock-in risks, necessitating long-term commitment to diversification and coordinated regulatory and incentive adjustments across interlinked low-carbon technologies

Diversification (marketing strategy) · Energy transition · Incentive · Megaproject · Openness to experience · Port (circuit theory) · Transformational leadership · Transition management (governance) · Transparency (behavior) · Maritime Ports and Logistics · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access