Transgenerational Differences in Turkish Heritage Speakers
The Case of Turkish Definiteness
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19487526 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Serkan Uygun (0000-0002-0880-9280, Bahçeşehir University), Leyla Zidani-Eroğlu (Central Connecticut State University) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 112 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-06-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Editora | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages11060112 |
| OpenAlex | W7163170435 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 59 |
In Turkish, definiteness is marked through accusative case marking -(y)I and the presence or absence of the prenominal determiner bir (one). Crucially the latter may function as an indefinite determiner depending on the context. Previous studies have shown that definiteness is a vulnerable phenomenon for Turkish heritage speakers, as they have to integrate different language modules (e.g., morphosyntax and discourse/pragmatics). This study tested 49 monolingual Turkish speakers from Türkiye and 32 heritage speakers from the USA via an acceptability judgment task. Twenty-three of the heritage speakers were first-generation, and nine were second-generation heritage speakers. The experimental stimuli were created by manipulating both the grammatical number of the object (singular bir kitap ‘one/a book’ vs. plural kitap-lar ‘books’) and whether the object was preceded by a numeric determiner (bare kitap ‘a book’ vs. non-bare beş kitap ‘five books’) to test the acceptability of the nominal’s correct definiteness marking in a subsequent sentence. The results indicate significant discrepancies between the first- and second-generation heritage speakers, indicating crucial transgenerational variation in the use of the correct form of Turkish definiteness, while the first-generation and monolingual speakers do not differ from each other. These findings suggest that the integration of morphosyntax and discourse/pragmatics in definiteness marking, a particular aspect of linguistic competence within theorizing in generative grammar, does not seem to be fully acquired by second-generation heritage speakers as a result of acquiring Turkish under heritage language conditions
Definiteness · Determiner · Generative grammar · Heritage language · Object (grammar) · Plural · Turkish · Language Development and Disorders · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
First Language Attrition
Heritage Languages and Their Speakers
Turkish
Language Attrition
Language Contact and Change
Modern Applied Statistics with S
Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism
Children use canonical sentence schemas
Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals
The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch
Referential and quantificational indefinites
Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers
Understanding heritage languages
Differential Object Marking in Child and Adult Spanish Heritage Speakers
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (Leap-Q)
Specificity and Definiteness in Sentence and Discourse Structure
Sources of variability in the acquisition of Differential Object Marking by Turkish heritage language children in the United States
Gradient Effects of Animacy on Differential Object Marking in Turkish
Gender assignment and gender agreement in adult bilinguals and second language learners of French
Why not heritage speakers
What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition
Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children
Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers
Introduction to the special issue – Heritage language studies and early child bilingualism research
Postverbal elements in immigrant Turkish
Simultaneous bilingualism
Knowledge of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers
Early child L2 acquisition
Inappropriate Choice of Definites in Turkish Heritage Speakers of German
Demonstratives in heritage Greek, Russian, and Turkish in Germany and the United States
Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian
Development of the Expression of Indefiniteness
A note on referent identifiability and co-presence
Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development
Heritage languages and their speakers
Back to basics
Hungarian Language Contact Outside Hungary
Salient stages in contact-induced grammatical change
Information structure in Turkish
Maturational Constraints and First Language Attrition
Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish
Differential object marking in Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian as heritage languages
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |