Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Best Interest of the Child in Islamic Family Law

Declarative and Enforceable Custody Protection in Indonesia and Malaysia

Bibliographic Data

ID19487643
AuthorsViorizza Suciani Putri (0000-0002-8307-1896, Padjadjaran University), Sonny Dewi Judiasih (0000-0001-5735-5468, Padjadjaran University), Hazar Kusmayanti (0000-0003-4236-0787, Padjadjaran University)
Year2026
Volume14
Issue1
Pages273-290
Publication date2026-02-02
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Nusantara Islam (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2252-5904 • E-ISSN: 2355-651X
PublisherSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University of Bandung (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.15575/ijni.v14i1.54393
OpenAlexW7127625687
LanguageEN

The principle of the best interest of the child constitutes a central normative foundation for post-divorce child custody protection within Islamic family law. Although this principle is widely recognised in statutory regulations and judicial practice, its application and juridical consequences vary considerably across legal systems. This study examines the regulation and application of the best interest of the child principle in Islamic family law in Indonesia and Malaysia, with particular attention to the legal implications arising from differences in their normative and procedural designs. Employing a normative legal research method with comparative and doctrinal approaches, the study analyses legislation, the Compilation of Islamic Law, judicial decisions, and relevant scholarly literature on Islamic family law and child protection in both jurisdictions. The analytical framework draws upon the concepts of ḥaḍānah and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah to assess the relationship between custody determination and the execution of court decisions. The findings demonstrate that both Indonesia and Malaysia formally recognise the best interest of the child as the guiding principle in determining child custody under Islamic family law. However, divergent normative and procedural configurations produce distinct juridical outcomes. In Indonesia, child custody protection predominantly operates as custody protection as declarative justice, where judicial decisions establish legal entitlements without being supported by effective enforcement mechanisms. In contrast, Malaysia’s Islamic family law system reflects a model of custody protection as enforceable justice, integrating custody determinations with enforcement measures and legal sanctions for non-compliance. These findings underscore that child protection in Islamic family law is shaped not merely by normative recognition, but by the extent to which legal systems connect custody determinations with enforceable institutional mechanisms

Best interests · Child custody · Enforcement · Family law · Islam · Normative · Sanctions · Statutory law · Gender and Women's Rights · Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies · Marriage and Family Dynamics

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae