Hostile work climate
Gender barriers in the European energy R&I workforce
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19487854 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maria Camilla Fraudatario (0000-0003-0817-8586, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies), Lucio Pisacane (0000-0001-6764-161X, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies), Marco Cellini (0000-0002-7580-2804, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, corresponding author), Cloe Mirenda (0000-0002-5295-0409, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 1800176-1800176 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-7775 • E-ISSN: 2297-7775 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fsoc.2026.1800176 |
| PMID | 42318571 |
| OpenAlex | W7163318666 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 65 |
Achieving climate neutrality by 2050 demands a fundamental transformation of the energy sector, which currently accounts for 76.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Meeting these targets requires attention not only to the green technologies produced by research and innovation (R&I), but also to who drives these innovations and under what working conditions. Despite progress made over recent decades, women remain systematically underrepresented in the energy sector, owing to deeply rooted structural dynamics: male-dominated organizational cultures, recruitment and evaluation processes shaped by gender bias, and professional climates that hinder women's full participation and career advancement. This study examines the R&I workforce in the energy sector, a domain in which gender imbalances have thus far received limited scholarly attention. A cross-national survey was conducted among employees of European public and private universities and research organizations, structured around sociographic and professional variables, organizational context variables, and four validated psychometric scales—Work-Related Quality of Life, Perceived Subtle Gender Bias Index, Just Energy Transition Knowledge Production, and Workplace Diversity Climate—comprising a total of 43 items. The data enabled examination of: i) perceptions regarding institutional support for women's career trajectories and the handling of both overt inequalities and implicit biases; ii) everyday workplace practices, such as professional recognition, empowerment, and well-being, as key determinants in fostering a genuine commitment to sustainability. Methodologically, the latent structure of the 43 items was identified through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, yielding nine composite factors subsequently used to perform a cluster analysis. The results identify two contrasting profiles: a Critical Cluster, predominantly female, in which the working environment is perceived as hostile and gender discrimination manifests in multiple forms, including implicit bias, verbal harassment, and inadequate support for work-life balance; and a Neutral Cluster, predominantly male and concentrated in the renewable energy, characterized by a more positive assessment of the organizational climate and limited awareness of gender stereotypes and discriminatory practices. This polarization calls into question the inclusivity and equity of the current R&I system in the energy sector. The study provides an empirical contribution to the debate on inclusive energy transitions and puts forward policy recommendations to strengthen gender equity measures within R&I organizations
Aging in the American workforce · Confirmatory factor analysis · Context (archaeology) · Diversity (politics) · Exploratory research · Occupational segregation · Reflexivity · Survey data collection · Work (physics) · Workforce · Career Development and Diversity · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Gender Diversity and Inequality
How Professors Think
The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science
Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice
Gender-based opportunity structure in the energy sector
Middle School, Middle-Skills
Creating and Optimizing Employment Opportunities for Women in the Clean Energy Sector in Canada
Athena Unbound
Gender, sexuality, and feminist critiques in energy research
Intersectional precarity in academia
Rethinking gender and identity in energy studies
Closing the renewable energy gender gap in the United States and Canada
Toward feminist energy systems
What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda
How do we practice equity, diversity and inclusion in sustainable energy research? Advice for modern researchers
Exploring the nexus of gender and energy transitions
From Backlash to Inclusion for All
Women's Scientific Employment and Family Formation
Not one of the family’
Unsettling Universities' Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures
The trouble with ‘work–life balance’ in neoliberal academia
Gender inequality in academia from the perspective of the dialogical self
Gender, Work Time, and Care Responsibilities Among Faculty 1
Perceived Subtle Gender Bias Index
Career Identities and Gender-STEM Stereotypes
When two movements collide
Gender differences in organizational fairness, diversity and inclusion
Walls all around
"Making STEM "Family Friendly
Mobility, Gender and Career Development in Higher Education
Gender inequality and research performance
Equity, technological innovation and sustainable behaviour in a low-carbon future
Go the extra mile
Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies
Doing Gender
Women, Science, and Academia
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |